4. Algebraic Representations of Beliefs and Attitudes: Partial Order Models for Item Responses

A partial order of discrete beliefs based on a generalization of item order in Guttman scaling generates a nonunidimensional collection of latent belief states that can be represented by a distributive lattice. By incorporating misclassification errors under local independence assumptions, the lattice structure is transformed into a latent class model for observed response states. We apply this model to survey responses dealing with government welfare programs and suggest that our approach can retrieve information where unidimensional and multidimensional models do not fit. The concluding section discusses directions for future work.

[1]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Criteria for Determining Whether Certain Categories in a Cross-Classification Table Should Be Combined, with Special Reference to Occupational Categories in an Occupational Mobility Table , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  'EM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data 1 , 1997 .

[3]  L. A. Goodman.  The Analysis of Systems of Qualitative Variables When Some of the Variables Are Unobservable. Part I-A Modified Latent Structure Approach , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Robert J. Mokken,et al.  A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. , 1973 .

[5]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Semiparametric Estimation in the Rasch Model and Related Exponential Response Models, Including a Simple Latent Class Model for Item Analysis , 1991 .

[6]  Samuel Shye,et al.  Introduction to Facet Theory , 1994 .

[7]  Lc Freeman,et al.  USING GALOIS LATTICES TO REPRESENT NETWORK DATA , 1993 .

[8]  Vincent Duquenne.  Models of possessions and lattice analysis , 1995 .

[9]  Otis Dudley Duncan,et al.  Notes on social measurement , 1973 .

[10]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications , 1966 .

[11]  M. Hout.  Abortion politics in the United States, 1972–1994: From single issue to ideology , 1999, Gender issues.

[12]  Andrzej Nowak,et al.  Attitudes as catastrophes: From dimensions to categories with increasing involvement. , 1994 .

[13]  Richard W. Hamming,et al.  Error detecting and error correcting codes , 1950 .

[14]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Latent Structure Analysis. , 1969 .

[15]  P. Boeck,et al.  Hierarchical classes: Model and data analysis , 1988 .

[16]  Edward H. Haertel.  Continuous and discrete latent structure models for item response data , 1990 .

[17]  A. Raftery.  A Note on Bayes Factors for Log‐Linear Contingency Table Models with Vague Prior Information , 1986 .

[18]  Samuel Shye,et al.  Partial-Order Scalogram Analysis by Base Coordinates and Lattice Mapping of the Items by Their Scalogram Roles , 1985 .

[19]  Otis Dudley Duncan,et al.  Indicators of Sex Typing: Traditional and Egalitarian, Situational and Ideological Responses , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Scott R. Eliason.  Maximum likelihood estimation: Logic and practice. , 1994 .

[21]  Melvin R. Novick,et al.  Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability , 1966 .

[22]  I. W. Molenaar,et al.  Rasch models: foundations, recent developments and applications , 1995 .

[23]  Charles H. Proctor,et al.  A probabilistic formulation and statistical analysis of guttman scaling , 1970 .