Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND The combined use of anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and invasive coronary procedures reduces ischemic coronary events but also increases bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We therefore assessed whether fondaparinux would preserve the anti-ischemic benefits of enoxaparin while reducing bleeding. METHODS We randomly assigned 20,078 patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive either fondaparinux (2.5 mg daily) or enoxaparin (1 mg per kilogram of body weight twice daily) for a mean of six days and evaluated death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at nine days (the primary outcome); major bleeding; and their combination. Patients were followed for up to six months. RESULTS The number of patients with primary-outcome events was similar in the two groups (579 with fondaparinux [5.8 percent] vs. 573 with enoxaparin [5.7 percent]; hazard ratio in the fondaparinux group, 1.01; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.13), satisfying the noninferiority criteria. The number of events meeting this combined outcome showed a nonsignificant trend toward a lower value in the fondaparinux group at 30 days (805 vs. 864, P=0.13) and at the end of the study (1222 vs. 1308, P=0.06). The rate of major bleeding at nine days was markedly lower with fondaparinux than with enoxaparin (217 events [2.2 percent] vs. 412 events [4.1 percent]; hazard ratio, 0.52; P<0.001). The composite of the primary outcome and major bleeding at nine days favored fondaparinux (737 events [7.3 percent] vs. 905 events [9.0 percent]; hazard ratio, 0.81; P<0.001). Fondaparinux was associated with a significantly reduced number of deaths at 30 days (295 vs. 352, P=0.02) and at 180 days (574 vs. 638, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS Fondaparinux is similar to enoxaparin in reducing the risk of ischemic events at nine days, but it substantially reduces major bleeding and improves long term mortality and morbidity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00139815.).

[1]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Randomized, Blinded Trial Comparing Fondaparinux With Unfractionated Heparin in Patients Undergoing Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Arixtra Study in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Evaluation (ASPIRE) Pilot Trial , 2005, Circulation.

[2]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, JAMA.

[3]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  A synthetic factor-Xa inhibitor (ORG31540/SR9017A) as an adjunct to fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction. The PENTALYSE study. , 2001, European heart journal.

[4]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic overview. , 2004, JAMA.

[5]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2005, JAMA.

[6]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  A dose-finding study of fondaparinux in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Pentasaccharide in Unstable Angina (PENTUA) Study. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Design and rationale of the MICHELANGELO Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS)-5 trial program evaluating fondaparinux, a synthetic factor Xa inhibitor, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2005, American heart journal.

[8]  Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials , 2005 .

[9]  Vladimir Stančić [New anticoagulant drugs]. , 2007, Lijecnicki vjesnik.

[10]  P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .

[11]  Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves,et al.  TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. , 2005 .

[12]  J. Hirsh,et al.  New anticoagulant drugs. , 2001, Chest.

[13]  R. Califf,et al.  Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[14]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  B. Wiens,et al.  Choosing an equivalence limit for noninferiority or equivalence studies. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[16]  B. Eriksson,et al.  Fondaparinux vs enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized double-blind studies. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  R. Califf,et al.  Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data , 2002, The Lancet.

[18]  Carlos Aguiar,et al.  TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. , 2005, European heart journal.

[19]  E. Boersma,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials ☆ , 2002 .

[20]  M Gent,et al.  Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.

[22]  G. Raskob,et al.  Fondaparinux or Enoxaparin for the Initial Treatment of Symptomatic Deep Venous Thrombosis , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  Catherine Sudlow,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Interventional cardiology: abstractEfficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic overview☆ , 2004 .

[25]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.