Estimation of Vertical Fuel Layers in Tree Crowns Using High Density LiDAR Data

The accurate prediction and mitigation of wildfire behaviour relies on accurate estimations of forest canopy fuels. New techniques to collect LiDAR point clouds from remotely piloted aerial systems (RPAS) allow for the prediction of forest fuels at extremely fine scales. This study uses a new method to examine the ability of such point clouds to characterize the vertical arrangement and volume of crown fuels from within individual trees. This method uses the density and vertical arrangement of LiDAR points to automatically extract and measure the dimensions of each cluster of vertical fuel. The amount and dimensions of these extracted clusters were compared against manually measured clusters that were collected through the manual measurement of over 100 trees. This validation dataset was composed of manual point cloud measurements for all portions of living crown fuel for each tree. The point clouds used for this were ground-based LiDAR point clouds that were ~80 times denser than the RPAS LiDAR point clouds. Over 96% of the extracted clusters were successfully matched to a manually measured cluster, representing ~97% of the extracted volume. A smaller percentage of the manually measured clusters (~79%) were matched to an extracted cluster, although these represented ~99% of the total measured volume. The vertical arrangement and dimensions of the matched clusters corresponded strongly to one another, although the automated method generally overpredicted each cluster’s lower boundary. Tree-level volumes and crown width were, respectively, predicted with R-squared values of 0.9111 and 0.7984 and RMSE values of 44.36 m2 and 0.53 m. Weaker relationships were observed for tree-level metrics that relied on the extraction of lower crown features (live crown length, live crown base height, lowest live branch height). These metrics were predicted with R-squared values of 0.5568, 0.3120, and 0.2011 and RMSE values of 3.53 m, 3.55 m, and 3.66 m. Overall, this study highlights strengths and weaknesses of the developed method and the utility of RPAS LiDAR point clouds relative to ground-based point clouds.

[1]  A. D. Wulf,et al.  Assessment of handheld mobile terrestrial laser scanning for estimating tree parameters , 2020, Journal of Forestry Research.

[2]  Jan Verbesselt,et al.  Monitoring spring phenology with high temporal resolution terrestrial LiDAR measurements , 2015 .

[3]  M. Herold,et al.  Quantifying branch architecture of tropical trees using terrestrial LiDAR and 3D modelling , 2018, Trees.

[4]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Tamm Review: Shifting global fire regimes: Lessons from reburns and research needs , 2017 .

[5]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Under-Canopy UAV Laser Scanning Providing Canopy Height and Stem Volume Accurately , 2021, Forests.

[7]  F. Smith,et al.  Estimating canopy bulk density and canopy base height for interior western US conifer stands , 2016 .

[8]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data , 2005 .

[9]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Temperate and boreal forest mega‐fires: characteristics and challenges , 2014 .

[10]  A. Carroll,et al.  Managing Wildlife Habitat: Complex Interactions With Biotic and Abiotic Disturbances , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[11]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  FuelCalc: A Method for Estimating Fuel Characteristics , 2006 .

[12]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1994, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  L. Monika Moskal,et al.  Fusion of LiDAR and imagery for estimating forest canopy fuels , 2010 .

[14]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Comparing Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and Wearable Laser Scanning (WLS) for Individual Tree Modeling at Plot Level , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  Estimating canopy fuel characteristics in five conifer stands in the western United States using tree and stand measurements , 2006 .

[16]  Wenkai Li,et al.  Delineating Individual Trees from Lidar Data: A Comparison of Vector- and Raster-based Segmentation Approaches , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Frederick W. Smith,et al.  Influence of Crown Biomass Estimators and Distribution on Canopy Fuel Characteristics in Ponderosa Pine Stands of the Black Hills , 2009 .

[18]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  lidR: An R package for analysis of Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data , 2020 .

[19]  Kenji Omasa,et al.  3-D voxel-based solid modeling of a broad-leaved tree for accurate volume estimation using portable scanning lidar , 2013 .