Simulated cataract does not reduce the benefit of RSVP

[1]  E Peli,et al.  The Role of Context in Reading with Central Field Loss , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  E Peli,et al.  Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  E Peli,et al.  Enhancement of text for the visually impaired. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  D J Madden,et al.  Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[6]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Visual Requirements for Reading , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Reading without saccadic eye movements , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  D J Madden,et al.  Four to ten milliseconds per year: age-related slowing of visual word identification. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading--X. Effects of age-related changes in vision. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[10]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  A. Healy,et al.  Facilitating text memory with additional processing opportunities in rapid sequential reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  G. Watson,et al.  Observations from the Psychology of Reading Relevant to Low Vision Research , 1987 .

[13]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Effects of reading span and textual coherence on rapid-sequential reading , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[14]  David E. Kieras,et al.  New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .

[15]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[17]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation (rsvp): a method for studying language processing , 2018 .

[18]  M. Masson.  Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[19]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[20]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  The Effect of Context on the Size of the Perceptual Unit Used in Word Recognition , 1981 .

[21]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity , 1970 .