What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

It is well established that memory is more accurate for own-relative to other-race faces (own-race bias), which has been suggested to result from larger perceptual expertise for own-race faces. Previous studies also demonstrated better memory for own-relative to other-gender faces, which is less likely to result from differences in perceptual expertise, and rather may be related to social in-group vs out-group categorization. We examined neural correlates of the own-gender bias using event-related potentials (ERP). In a recognition memory experiment, both female and male participants remembered faces of their respective own gender more accurately compared with other-gender faces. ERPs during learning yielded significant differences between the subsequent memory effects (subsequently remembered - subsequently forgotten) for own-gender compared with other-gender faces in the occipito-temporal P2 and the central N200, whereas neither later subsequent memory effects nor ERP old/new effects at test reflected a neural correlate of the own-gender bias. We conclude that the own-gender bias is mainly related to study phase processes, which is in line with sociocognitive accounts.

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[4]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  C. C. Wood,et al.  ERPs predictive of subsequent recall and recognition performance , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[7]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[8]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[9]  W. Sommer,et al.  Human brain potential correlates of face encoding into memory. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Valentine,et al.  Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  S. McKelvie,et al.  Gender differences in recognition memory for faces and cars: Evidence for the interest hypothesis , 1993 .

[12]  P Berg,et al.  A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[14]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[15]  W. Sommer,et al.  Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[16]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Harry Wechsler,et al.  The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[18]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[19]  A. Richardson-Klavehn,et al.  Remembering and knowing , 2000 .

[20]  J. Pernier,et al.  Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[22]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. , 2001 .

[23]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  C. Lewin,et al.  Sex differences in face recognition—Women’s faces make the difference , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[26]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  B Renault,et al.  Face versus non-face object perception and the ‘other-race’ effect: a spatio-temporal event-related potential study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  T. Ito,et al.  Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  M. Giard,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Age and Gender Perception on Human Faces , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Stefan R. Schweinberger,et al.  Covert Recognition and the Neural System for Face Processing , 2003, Cortex.

[31]  D. Wright,et al.  An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive functions , 2003 .

[33]  C. I. Wright,et al.  Sex-differential brain activation during exposure to female and male faces , 2004, Neuroreport.

[34]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  D. Jeffreys A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Denise C. Park,et al.  A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[38]  David A. Butz,et al.  Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach , 2005 .

[39]  F. Guillem,et al.  Gender differences in memory processing: Evidence from event-related potentials to faces , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face processing stages: Impact of difficulty and the separation of effects , 2006, Brain Research.

[42]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Agneta Herlitz,et al.  Higher face recognition ability in girls: Magnified by own-sex and own-ethnicity bias , 2006, Memory.

[44]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[45]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[46]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Dissociating recollection from familiarity: Electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect , 2007, NeuroImage.

[47]  Activity-homeostasis preserves synaptic plasticity in Purkinje cell but calcium is not the activity-sensor , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[48]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  The Cross-Category Effect , 2007, Psychological science.

[49]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit : Toward a solution to an insidious problem , 2007 .

[52]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components , 2008, Brain Research.

[54]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[55]  A. Nobre,et al.  Social contact and other-race face processing in the human brain. , 2008, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[56]  Bruce D. Bartholow,et al.  The neural correlates of race , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  N250 ERP Correlates of the Acquisition of Face Representations across Different Images , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[59]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[60]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Neural Correlates of Generic versus Gender-specific Face Adaptation , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Shihui Han,et al.  Sex differences in face gender recognition: An event-related potential study , 2010, Brain Research.

[62]  When Do Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition Occur? Encoding versus Post-Encoding , 2010 .

[63]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. , 2010, Psychological review.

[65]  A. Burton,et al.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[66]  Stéphanie Caharel,et al.  Other-race and inversion effects during the structural encoding stage of face processing in a race categorization task: an event-related brain potential study. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[67]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Awareness of Central Luminance Edge Is Crucial for the Craik-o'brien-cornsweet Effect , 2022 .

[68]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The neural correlates of memory encoding and recognition for own-race and other-race faces , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  Agneta Herlitz,et al.  Women's own-gender bias in face recognition memory. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[70]  Tim Curran,et al.  Experts’ memory: an ERP study of perceptual expertise effects on encoding and recognition , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[71]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Face Perception , 2011 .

[72]  M. Eimer The Face-Sensitive N170 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential , 2011 .

[73]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Why Some Faces won't be Remembered: Brain Potentials Illuminate Successful Versus Unsuccessful Encoding for Same-Race and Other-Race Faces , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[74]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of processing faces of younger and older individuals. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[75]  Holger Wiese,et al.  Daily-life contact affects the own-age bias and neural correlates of face memory in elderly participants , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  The faces you remember: Caricaturing shape facilitates brain processes reflecting the acquisition of new face representations , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[77]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  Holger Wiese,et al.  The role of age and ethnic group in face recognition memory: ERP evidence from a combined own-age and own-race bias study , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[79]  Claudia Schulz,et al.  Faces forming traces: Neurophysiological correlates of learning naturally distinctive and caricatured faces , 2012, NeuroImage.

[80]  Tiffany A Ito,et al.  Structural face encoding: How task affects the N170's sensitivity to race. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[81]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  The neural signature of the own-race bias: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[82]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .