Feature and Tendency of Technology Transfer in Z-Park Patent Cooperation Network: From the Perspective of Global Optimal Path

Abstract Purpose This study aims to provide a new framework for analyzing the path of technology diffusion in the innovation network at the regional level and industrial level respectively, which is conducive to the integration of innovation resources, the coordinated development of innovative subjects, and the improvement of innovation abilities. Design/methodology/approach Based on the Z-Park patent cooperation data, we establish Inter-Enterprise Technology Transfer Network model and apply the concept of Pivotability to describe the key links of technology diffusion and quantify the importance of innovative partnerships. By measuring the topologically structural characteristics in the levels of branch park and the technosphere, this paper demonstrates how technology spreads and promotes overall innovation activities within the innovation network. Findings The results indicate that: (1) Patent cooperation network of the Z-Park displays heterogeneity and the connections between the innovative subjects distribute extremely uneven. (2) Haidian park owns the highest pivotability in the IETTN model, yet the related inter-enterprise patent cooperation is mainly concentrated in its internal, failing to facilitate the technology diffusion across multiple branch parks. (3) Such fields as “electronics and information” and “advanced manufacturing” are prominent in the cross-technosphere cooperation, while fields such as “new energy” and “environmental protection technology” can better promote industrial integration. Research limitations Only the part of the joint patent application is taken into account while establishing the patent cooperation network. The other factors that influence the mechanism of technology diffusion in the innovation network need to be further studied, such as financial capital, market competition, and personnel mobility, etc. Practical implications The findings of this paper will provide useful information and suggestions for the administration and policy-making of high-tech parks. Originality/value The value of this paper is to build a bridge between the massive amount of patent data and the nature of technology diffusion, and to develop a set of tools to analyze the nonlinear relations between innovative subjects.

[1]  Na Zhang,et al.  An evolutionary process of global nanotechnology collaboration: a social network analysis of patents at USPTO , 2017, Scientometrics.

[2]  S. Zahra,et al.  The Role of External Knowledge Sources and Organizational Design in the Process of Opportunity Exploitation , 2013 .

[3]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building , 2012 .

[4]  Fuxiang Wu,et al.  Influence mechanism of multi-network embeddedness to enterprises innovation performance based on knowledge management perspective , 2017, Cluster Computing.

[5]  Rolf Sternberg,et al.  The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behavior of European Firms? , 2001 .

[6]  P. Keinz,et al.  Synergies among Producer Firms, Lead Users, and User Communities: The Case of the LEGO Producer–User Ecosystem† , 2014 .

[7]  Ke-Chiun Chang,et al.  Determinants of highly-cited green patents: The perspective of network characteristics , 2020, PloS one.

[8]  Tian Liu,et al.  Effect of distribution of weight on the efficiency of weighted networks , 2011 .

[9]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Examining the small world phenomenon in the patent citation network: a case study of the radio frequency identification (RFID) network , 2009, Scientometrics.

[10]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model , 2010 .

[11]  Wenping Wang,et al.  The impact of network structure on innovation efficiency: An agent-based study in the context of innovation networks , 2015, Complex..

[12]  Cheng-Hua Tzeng Managing innovation for economic development in greater China: The origins of Hsinchu and Zhongguancun , 2010 .

[13]  S. Maroulis,et al.  The Role of Social Network Structure in Street-Level Innovation , 2017 .

[14]  Xiaoyong Qiao,et al.  Betweenness centrality for similarity-weight network and its application to measuring industrial sectors’ pivotability on the global value chain , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[15]  Giselle Rampersad,et al.  Managing innovation networks: Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks , 2010 .

[16]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[17]  Xiaoxiao Shi,et al.  Network inertia and inbound open innovation: is there a bidirectional relationship? , 2019, Scientometrics.

[18]  Shanting Wei,et al.  The more cooperation, the better? Optimizing enterprise cooperative strategy in collaborative innovation networks , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[19]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  E. Uyarra,et al.  Policies for science, technology and innovation:: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting , 2008 .

[22]  R. Harms,et al.  Knowledge growth in university-industry innovation networks – Results from a simulation study , 2020 .

[23]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  An analysis of property-function based patent networks for strategic R&D planning in fast-moving industries: The case of silicon-based thin film solar cells , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..