Shape distribution-based approach to comparing 3D CAD assembly models

As a key technology for three-dimensional (3D) model retrieval from model databases, the ability to perform comparisons of 3D models is important. In particular, during the product design phase, 3D CAD models should be robustly retrieved for design reuse or machining process planning. However, typical retrieval methods that are based on model names, codes, or annotations are limited in terms of their usability and robustness. Therefore, there are increasing requirements for shape-based 3D model retrieval techniques, as well as the ability to perform 3D model comparisons. In this paper, we propose a shape distribution-based 3D CAD assembly comparison method that has the ability to identify dissimilarities in 3D CAD assembly models by differentiating between assembly relationships and part-shape dissimilarities. This is different from existing methods, which are limited to only shape dissimilarities. We present experimental results for various test cases by comparing our proposed method and existing methods. Based on our experiment results, we found that our method can enable a comprehensive comparison of 3D CAD assembly models including assembly relationship dissimilarities, part-shape dissimilarities, and overall model dissimilarities.

[1]  Jinggao Li,et al.  Profile-based feature representation method and its application in data exchange from mechanical CAD systems to ship CAD systems , 2016 .

[2]  Berthold K. P. Horn.  Extended Gaussian images , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Dong-Jin Yoo,et al.  New paradigms in cellular material design and fabrication , 2015 .

[4]  Xiang Chen,et al.  A flexible assembly retrieval approach for model reuse , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Gang Li,et al.  The modeling approach of digital real tooth surfaces of hypoid gears based on non-geometric-feature segmentation and interpolation algorithm , 2016 .

[6]  Soonhung Han,et al.  Web Service with Parallel Processing Capabilities for the Retrieval of CAD Assembly Data , 2011, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[7]  Gongning Luo,et al.  A graph-based method for fitting planar B-spline curves with intersections , 2016, J. Comput. Des. Eng..

[8]  Tae Jin Hwang,et al.  Shape similarity measurement using ray distances for mass customization , 2004, SM '04.

[9]  Dieter Roller,et al.  A framework for similarity recognition of CAD models , 2016, J. Comput. Des. Eng..

[10]  Duhwan Mun,et al.  Verification of product design using regulation knowledgebase and Web services , 2015 .

[11]  Chih-Hsing Chu,et al.  Shape similarity measurement for 3D mechanical part using D2 shape distribution and negative feature decomposition , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[12]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[13]  Kang Park,et al.  The vulnerability assessment of ground combat vehicles using target functional modeling and FTA , 2016 .

[14]  Duhwan Mun,et al.  Enhanced volume decomposition minimizing overlapping volumes for the recognition of design features , 2015, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology.

[15]  Remco C. Veltkamp,et al.  Polyhedral Model Retrieval Using Weighted Point Sets , 2003, Int. J. Image Graph..

[16]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Content-based assembly search: A step towards assembly reuse , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[17]  Ryutarou Ohbuchi,et al.  Shape-similarity search of 3D models by using enhanced shape functions , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[18]  R. Allen Miller,et al.  A database system of mechanical components based on geometric and topological similarity. Part I: representation , 2003, Comput. Aided Des..

[19]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Shape distributions , 2002, TOGS.

[20]  C. Chu,et al.  Similarity assessment of 3D mechanical components for design reuse , 2006 .

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Reuse of Manufacturing Knowledge to Facilitate Platform-Based Product Realization , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[22]  Qiang Meng,et al.  A rapid life cycle assessment method based on green features in supporting conceptual design , 2015 .

[23]  Debasish Dutta,et al.  Feature Based Shape Similarity Measurement for Retrieval of Mechanical Parts , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[24]  William C. Regli,et al.  Using shape distributions to compare solid models , 2002, SMA '02.

[25]  Gurdip Singh,et al.  Design Similarity Measures for Process Planning and Design Evaluation , 1997 .

[26]  Remco C. Veltkamp,et al.  A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods , 2004, Proceedings Shape Modeling Applications, 2004..

[27]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Determining Semantic Similarity among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[28]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Developing an engineering shape benchmark for CAD models , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[29]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Knowledge-based part similarity measurement utilizing ontology and multi-criteria decision making technique , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[30]  Marc Rioux,et al.  Description of shape information for 2-D and 3-D objects , 2000, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[31]  D. Kendall.  The diffusion of shape , 1977, Advances in Applied Probability.