Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping

Over the last few years, 3D imaging of plant geometry has become of significant importance for phenotyping and plant breeding. Several sensing techniques, like 3D reconstruction from multiple images and laser scanning, are the methods of choice in different research projects. The use of RGBcameras for 3D reconstruction requires a significant amount of post-processing, whereas in this context, laser scanning needs huge investment costs. The aim of the present study is a comparison between two current 3D imaging low-cost systems and a high precision close-up laser scanner as a reference method. As low-cost systems, the David laser scanning system and the Microsoft Kinect Device were used. The 3D measuring accuracy of both low-cost sensors was estimated based on the deviations of test specimens. Parameters extracted from the volumetric shape of sugar beet taproots, the leaves of sugar beets and the shape of wheat ears were evaluated. These parameters are compared regarding accuracy and correlation to reference measurements. The evaluation scenarios were chosen with respect to recorded plant parameters in current phenotyping projects. In the present study, low-cost 3D imaging devices have been shown to be highly reliable for the demands of plant phenotyping, with the potential to be implemented in automated application procedures, while saving acquisition costs. Our study confirms that a carefully selected low-cost sensor is able to replace an expensive laser scanner in many plant phenotyping scenarios.

[1]  Sander Oude Elberink,et al.  Accuracy and Resolution of Kinect Depth Data for Indoor Mapping Applications , 2012, Sensors.

[2]  P. Lammers,et al.  Smart detection of leaf wilting by 3D image processing and 2D Fourier transform , 2013 .

[3]  Didier Stricker,et al.  Algorithms for 3D Shape Scanning with a Depth Camera , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Philippe Lucidarme,et al.  On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants , 2012 .

[6]  K. Chenu,et al.  PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[7]  Osama Moselhi,et al.  Integrating automated data acquisition technologies for progress reporting of construction projects , 2009 .

[8]  H. Ingensand,et al.  A tool to model 3D coarse-root development with annual resolution , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[9]  Sven Molkenstruck,et al.  Low-Cost Laser Range Scanner and Fast Surface Registration Approach , 2006, DAGM-Symposium.

[10]  H. Jones,et al.  New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[11]  Heiner Kuhlmann,et al.  Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  Kourosh Khoshelham,et al.  Accuracy analysis of kinect depth data , 2012 .

[13]  D. Inzé,et al.  Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. , 2013, Trends in plant science.

[14]  K. D. Mankoff,et al.  The Kinect: a low‐cost, high‐resolution, short‐range 3D camera , 2013 .

[15]  K. Omasa,et al.  Estimating vertical plant area density profile and growth parameters of a wheat canopy at different growth stages using three-dimensional portable lidar imaging , 2009 .

[16]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant. , 2010 .

[17]  Anne-Katrin Mahlein,et al.  Recent advances in sensing plant diseases for precision crop protection , 2012, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[18]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  Real-Time Tree-Foliage Surface Estimation Using a Ground Laser Scanner , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[19]  Ricardo Aroca,et al.  Importance of native arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation in the halophyte Asteriscus maritimus for successful establishment and growth under saline conditions , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[20]  L. Xiong,et al.  Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. , 2013, Current opinion in plant biology.

[21]  H. Ingensand,et al.  Incorporating 2D tree-ring data in 3D laser scans of coarse-root systems , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[22]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[23]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Erratum: Competition among memes in a world with limited attention , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[24]  N. Maslaris,et al.  Sugar beet root shape and its relation with yield and quality , 2010, Sugar Tech.

[25]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Kintinuous: Spatially Extended KinectFusion , 2012, AAAI 2012.

[26]  B. Andrieu,et al.  Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[27]  Bruno Andrieu,et al.  Ground cover and leaf area index of maize and sugar beet crops , 1997 .

[28]  Falk Schreiber,et al.  HTPheno: An image analysis pipeline for high-throughput plant phenotyping , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[29]  J. Reif,et al.  Precision phenotyping of biomass accumulation in triticale reveals temporal genetic patterns of regulation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[30]  M. Tester,et al.  High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[31]  John R. Evans,et al.  Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain , 2001 .

[32]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean. , 2011, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[33]  George Azzari,et al.  Rapid Characterization of Vegetation Structure with a Microsoft Kinect Sensor , 2013, Sensors.

[34]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[35]  J. Fripp,et al.  A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis , 2012, BMC Plant Biology.

[36]  Xiaopeng Zhang,et al.  Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[37]  K. Keightley,et al.  Original paper: 3D volumetric modeling of grapevine biomass using Tripod LiDAR , 2010 .

[38]  N. Anten Optimal photosynthetic characteristics of individual plants in vegetation stands and implications for species coexistence. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[39]  K. Omasa,et al.  3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[40]  Dieter Fox,et al.  RGB-D mapping: Using Kinect-style depth cameras for dense 3D modeling of indoor environments , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[41]  Kenji Omasa,et al.  3-D Modeling of Tomato Canopies Using a High-Resolution Portable Scanning Lidar for Extracting Structural Information , 2011, Sensors.

[42]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. , 2013, Annual review of plant biology.

[43]  Arno Ruckelshausen,et al.  BreedVision — A Multi-Sensor Platform for Non-Destructive Field-Based Phenotyping in Plant Breeding , 2013, Sensors.

[44]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  KinectFusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[45]  Susanne Brink More review content in 2003 , 2003 .

[46]  Radu Bogdan Rusu,et al.  3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.