Application of an abstract concept across magnitude dimensions by fish

Mastering relational concepts and applying them to different contexts presupposes abstraction capacities and implies a high level of cognitive sophistication. One way to investigate extrapolative abilities is to assess cross-dimensional application of an abstract relational magnitude rule to new domains. Here we show that angelfish initially trained to choose either the shorter of two lines in a spatial task (line-length discrimination task) or the array with “fewer” items (numerical discrimination task) spontaneously transferred the learnt rule to novel stimuli belonging to the previously unseen dimension demonstrating knowledge of the abstract concept of “smaller”. Our finding challenges the idea that the ability to master abstract magnitude concepts across domains is unique to humans and suggests that the circuits involved in rule learning and magnitude processing might be evolutionary conserved.

[1]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[2]  S. Phillips,et al.  Relational knowledge: the foundation of higher cognition , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  D. Burr,et al.  Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[4]  E. Spelke,et al.  Representations of space, time, and number in neonates , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Glimpse of ATOM in non-human species? , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[6]  Bonnie M. Perdue,et al.  Comparative Cognition: Past, Present, and Future. , 2014, International journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Number Versus Contour Length in Infants' Discrimination of Small Visual Sets , 1999 .

[8]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Use of Number by Fish , 2009, PloS one.

[9]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Hyo-Won Kim,et al.  Association between the GRM7 rs3792452 polymorphism and attention deficit hyperacitiveity disorder in a Korean sample , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[11]  H Woodside,et al.  A Developmental Perspective , 1977, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[12]  Jacky Emmerton,et al.  Pigeons’ serial ordering of numerosity with visual arrays , 1997 .

[13]  Roger K. R. Thompson,et al.  Concept learning in animals. , 2008 .

[14]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Neural correlates of categories and concepts , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  D. Holdstock.  Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[16]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[17]  R. Bshary,et al.  Fish cognition , 2014, Current Biology.

[18]  Culum Brown.  Tool Use in Fishes , 2012 .

[19]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line , 2015, Science.

[20]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish , 2011, Cognition.

[21]  E. MacLean.  Unraveling the evolution of uniquely human cognition , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy , 2004, Cognition.

[23]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans , 2010, Cognition.

[24]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Transfer from Number to Size Reveals Abstract Coding of Magnitude in Honeybees , 2019, bioRxiv.

[25]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Understanding the origin of number sense: a review of fish studies , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Emily A. Lewis,et al.  The impact of emotion on numerical estimation: A developmental perspective , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons , 2017, Current Biology.

[28]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  The concepts of ‘sameness’ and ‘difference’ in an insect , 2001, Nature.

[30]  O. Lazareva,et al.  Relational learning in a context of transposition: a review. , 2012, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[31]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[32]  S. Lea,et al.  The Making of Human Concepts , 2010 .

[33]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Large Number Discrimination by Mosquitofish , 2010, PloS one.

[34]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Representation of Abstract Quantitative Rules Applied to Spatial and Numerical Magnitudes in Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[36]  A. Manica,et al.  Fish choose appropriately when and with whom to collaborate , 2014, Current Biology.

[37]  E. Brannon,et al.  The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: using number is just easier. , 2008, Child development.

[38]  O. Güntürkün.  The avian ‘prefrontal cortex’ and cognition , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[39]  Sami R. Yousif,et al.  The Additive-Area Heuristic: An Efficient but Illusory Means of Visual Area Approximation , 2019, Psychological science.

[40]  W. Roberts,et al.  Can dogs count , 2013 .

[41]  M. Giurfa,et al.  Conceptual learning by miniature brains , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  L. Regolin,et al.  Numerical Abstraction in Young Domestic Chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  Marco Dadda,et al.  A new training procedure for studying discrimination learning in fish , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  Kent D. Bodily,et al.  Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning. , 2007, Comparative cognition & behavior reviews.

[45]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Laterality enhances numerical skills in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[46]  Sara Cordes,et al.  Number, time, and space are not singularly represented: Evidence against a common magnitude system beyond early childhood , 2019, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[47]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Development and application of a new method to investigate cognition in newborn guppies , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[48]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Inter-Specific Differences in Numerical Abilities Among Teleost Fish , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[49]  D. Geary,et al.  Young children's core symbolic and nonsymbolic quantitative knowledge in the prediction of later mathematics achievement. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[50]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Basic Math in Monkeys and College Students , 2007, PLoS biology.

[51]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical abilities predict mathematical achievements but contradict ATOM , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[52]  M. Beran,et al.  Bears ‘count’ too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears, Ursus americanus , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  Russell A. Powell,et al.  Episodic-like memory in zebrafish , 2016, Animal Cognition.

[54]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Relative versus absolute numerical representation in fish: Can guppies represent “fourness”? , 2015, Animal Cognition.

[55]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Do humans (Homo sapiens) and fish (Pterophyllum scalare) make similar numerosity judgments? , 2016, Journal of comparative psychology.

[56]  William Saban,et al.  Endogenous orienting in the archer fish , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  A. Nieder,et al.  The long and the short of it: Rule-based relative length discrimination in carrion crows, Corvus corone , 2014, Behavioural Processes.