Supporting continuous learning in a large organization: the role of group and organizational perspectives.

Many organizations recognize the need to continuously adapt and learn in order to survive and remain competitive. Learning and therefore change in organizations is driven in two ways. First, there is strategically driven learning, motivated by high-level factors such as market changes, company mergers and newly emerging approaches to organizational management and workplace learning. These changes reveal themselves in the introduction of new training programmes, recruitment strategies and knowledge management methodologies. Second, there is local, continuous learning occurring from the ground up. This is revealed as workers become more adept at their job through experience and collaboration with colleagues. Continuous learning is more gradual and requires local autonomy. This paper describes an experiment in supporting local, continuous learning, and its dissemination, but driven by a strategic initiative of the organization. This work raised many issues concerning the difficulty of integrating local and global organizational influences on learning. We outline lessons learned and suggestions as to the extent to which it is possible to align continuous learning with a company-wide perspective.

[1]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[2]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among CAD users , 1992, CHI.

[4]  Andrew Sanders,et al.  The case for the prosecution , 1991 .

[5]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[7]  Elizabeth Barnett,et al.  Knowledge management initiatives: learning from failure , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[9]  Steven Dhondt,et al.  Human factors in organizational design and management-VI : Proceedings of the sixth International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management held in the Hague, the Netherlands, August 19-22, 1998 , 1998 .

[10]  C. H. Edwards Applied ergonomics. , 1990, Work.

[11]  Tamara Sumner,et al.  Designers and their tools: computer support for domain construction , 1996 .

[12]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[13]  James T. Walz The Wealth of Knowledge: Intellectual Capital and the Twenty‐First Century Organization , 2005 .

[14]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[15]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[16]  John Domingue,et al.  Moving from On-the-job Training towards Organisational Learning , 1999 .

[17]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[19]  Siegmar Pallaschke,et al.  A knowledge management initiative in ESA/ESOC , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[20]  Toni Ivergård Information technology and knowledge-based business development , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[21]  D. Detterman The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. , 1996 .

[22]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  A. Brooking Corporate Memory: Strategies For Knowledge Management , 1998 .