An Overview of Methods for Applied Decision Analysis

Decision analysis is not just trees anymore. Influence diagrams improve communication among managers and analysts about key dependencies in a decision under uncertainty. Algebraic formulation methods allow compact representation of decision models that are too complex to handle with decision trees. Utility functions model attitude toward risk taking and trade-offs among conflicting objectives in a way that is both practical and conceptually sound. Behavioral research has shown how to correctly elicit judgmental information about uncertainties, and accurate approximations are available to summarize these judgments. Recently developed computer tools use these approaches to model real-world decisions efficiently.

[1]  Peter McNamee,et al.  Decision Analysis with SUPERTREE , 1987 .

[2]  James L. Corner,et al.  Decision Analysis Applications in the Operations Research Literature, 1970-1989 , 1991, Oper. Res..

[3]  A. C. Miller,et al.  Discrete Approximations of Probability Distributions , 1983 .

[4]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Decision analysis: practice and promise , 1988 .

[5]  Ross D. Shachter Probabilistic Inference and Influence Diagrams , 1988, Oper. Res..

[6]  Craig W. Kirkwood,et al.  Multiobjective Decision Analysis for Transmission Conductor Selection , 1978 .

[7]  G. Debreu Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory , 1959 .

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Multiplicative Utility Functions , 1974, Oper. Res..

[9]  William A. Miller,et al.  A comparison of approaches and implementations for automating decision analysis , 1990 .

[10]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Empirical and theoretical relationships between value and utility functions , 1984 .

[11]  M. W. Merkhofer,et al.  Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Carl-Axel S. Staël von Holstein,et al.  Exceptional Paper---Probability Encoding in Decision Analysis , 1975 .

[13]  Nicholas A. Jr. Zaino,et al.  Optimal Discrete Approximations for Continuous Outcomes with Applications in Decision and Risk Analysis , 1989 .

[14]  Ross D. Shachter Evaluating Influence Diagrams , 1986, Oper. Res..

[15]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  The art of assessing multiattribute utility functions , 1977 .

[16]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  Alvin W. Drake,et al.  Fundamentals of Applied Probability Theory , 1967 .

[18]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[19]  D. Keefer,et al.  Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables , 1983 .

[20]  Ward Edwards,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Patrick L. Brockett,et al.  Managerial Decision Analysis , 1989 .

[22]  Craig W. Kirkwood An algebraic approach to formulating and solving large models for sequential decisions under uncertainty , 1993 .

[23]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[24]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Preference Conditions for Multiattribute Value Functions , 1980, Oper. Res..

[25]  Samuel Holtzman,et al.  Intelligent decision systems , 1988 .