Comparative evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology, culture, and PCR in diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis

In developing countries, where tuberculosis (TB) is still rampant, tuberculous lymphadenopathy (TB LAP) is one of the most common causes of LAP. Rapid diagnosis and adequate treatment are very important. As a primary diagnostic tool, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has provided an efficient alternative to excision. Cytologic diagnosis can be made with cytomorphologic features of well‐formed epithelioid granulomas and the presence of caseous necrosis. However, bacteriological confirmation is essential because of the presence of various granulomatous inflammation. This study was performed to evaluate and compare the role of FNAC, mycobacterial culture, and PCR in diagnosing tuberculous lymphadenitis. FNA material was collected from 50 patients and was subjected to analysis by cytomorphology, ZN stain, M. tuberculosis culture, and PCR. Out of 50 cases, 36 cases showed cytological features consistent with TB. The most common cytomorphological pattern was epithelioid cell granulomas along with necrosis seen in 17 cases (34%), followed by necrosis only in 13 cases(26%). TBLAP was correctly diagnosed by acid‐fast bacilli (AFB) smear in 26 cases, by culture in 30 cases and by PCR in 30 cases. Overall sensitivity of AFB smear was 76.47% and that of culture as well as PCR was 88.23%. In conclusion, presence of granulomas and caseation necrosis are highly suggestive of tubercular etiology, especially in scenario of developing countries where incidence of TB is high. Cytomorphology can be supplemented with AFB smear and culture wherever required and PCR should be kept as a reserve method for equivocal cases. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Efsun Uğur Chousein,et al.  Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in non-human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults in an endemic region , 2007, Annals of thoracic medicine.

[2]  Prakash S Bisen,et al.  Modern approaches to a rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis: promises and challenges ahead. , 2007, Tuberculosis.

[3]  E. Gotuzzo,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a 16S ribosomal RNA polymerase chain reaction test for the diagnosis of lymph node tuberculosis. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  B. Das,et al.  Assessment of possible tuberculous lymphadenopathy by PCR compared to non-molecular methods. , 2005, Journal of medical microbiology.

[5]  M. Goel,et al.  Dot-ELISA vs. PCR of Fine Needle Aspirates of Tuberculous Lymphadenitis , 2005, Acta Cytologica.

[6]  S. Gupta,et al.  Comparison of the conventional diagnostic modalities, bactec culture and polymerase chain reaction test for diagnosis of tuberculosis. , 2005, Indian journal of medical microbiology.

[7]  S. Sethi,et al.  A 16-year study of HIV seroprevalence and HIV-related diseases in a teaching tertiary care hospital in India , 2004, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[8]  E. Khalil,et al.  Diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis by FNAC, microbiological methods and PCR: a comparative study , 2004, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[9]  J. Sainsbury,et al.  Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery , 2004 .

[10]  A. Mohan,et al.  Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis , 2019, Springer International Publishing.

[11]  Amita Jain,et al.  Application of enzyme amplified mycobacterial DNA detection in the diagnosis of pulmonary & extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. , 2003, The Indian journal of medical research.

[12]  J. McCormick,et al.  Diagnosis of tuberculosis lymphadenitis using a polymerase chain reaction on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. , 2003, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[13]  G. Nataraj,et al.  Correlation of fine needle aspiration cytology, smear and culture in tuberculous lymphadenitis: a prospective study. , 2002, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[14]  G. Gong,et al.  Nested PCR for diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis and PCR‐SSCP for identification of rifampicin resistance in fine‐needle aspirates , 2002, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[15]  M. Goel,et al.  Polymerase Chain Reaction vs. Conventional Diagnosis in Fine Needle Aspirates of Tuberculous Lymph Nodes , 2001, Acta Cytologica.

[16]  Neetu J. Jain,et al.  Comparison of in house polymerase chain reaction with conventional techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in granulomatous lymphadenopathy , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  Y. Ko,et al.  Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis From Fine‐Needle Aspirate for the Diagnosis of Cervical Tuberculous Lymphadenitis , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  Soylu,et al.  Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cyt_logy in tuberculous lymphadenitis , 1998 .

[19]  N. Kumar,et al.  AFB Staining in cytodiagnosis of tuberculosis without classical features: a comparison of Ziehl‐Neelsen and fluorescent methods , 1998, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[20]  M. Bose,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS BY POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION IN CLINICAL SPECIMENS , 1998 .

[21]  E. Ha,et al.  Application of PCR from the fine needle aspirates for the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. , 1996, Journal of Korean medical science.

[22]  G. Maartens,et al.  A comparative study of the polymerase chain reaction and conventional procedures for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion. , 1992, Tubercle and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[23]  D. Katzenstein,et al.  Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus gene amplification by heparin , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[24]  I. Taylor Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery , 1985 .

[25]  G. Seward The salivary glands. , 1975, Dental update.