Effect of affordable technology on physical activity levels and mobility outcomes in rehabilitation: a protocol for the Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial

Introduction People with mobility limitations can benefit from rehabilitation programmes that provide a high dose of exercise. However, since providing a high dose of exercise is logistically challenging and resource-intensive, people in rehabilitation spend most of the day inactive. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of the addition of affordable technology to usual care on physical activity and mobility in people with mobility limitations admitted to inpatient aged and neurological rehabilitation units compared to usual care alone. Methods and analysis A pragmatic, assessor blinded, parallel-group randomised trial recruiting 300 consenting rehabilitation patients with reduced mobility will be conducted. Participants will be individually randomised to intervention or control groups. The intervention group will receive technology-based exercise to target mobility and physical activity problems for 6 months. The technology will include the use of video and computer games/exercises and tablet applications as well as activity monitors. The control group will not receive any additional intervention and both groups will receive usual inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation care over the 6-month study period. The coprimary outcomes will be objectively assessed physical activity (proportion of the day spent upright) and mobility (Short Physical Performance Battery) at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include: self-reported and objectively assessed physical activity, mobility, cognition, activity performance and participation, utility-based quality of life, balance confidence, technology self-efficacy, falls and service utilisation. Linear models will assess the effect of group allocation for each continuously scored outcome measure with baseline scores entered as a covariate. Fall rates between groups will be compared using negative binomial regression. Primary analyses will be preplanned, conducted while masked to group allocation and use an intention-to-treat approach. Ethics and dissemination The protocol has been approved by the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees and the results will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Trial registration number ACTRN12614000936628. Pre-results.

[1]  J. Annesi,et al.  Effects of Virtual Reality-Enhanced Exercise Equipment on Adherence and Exercise-Induced Feeling States , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The Netherlands: A systematic review of available evidence , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  P. Lapuerta,et al.  Change in physical performance over time in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[4]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[5]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Catherine Sherrington,et al.  Development of a tool for prediction of falls in rehabilitation settings (Predict_FIRST): a prospective cohort study. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  M. Galea,et al.  Physical activity by elderly patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation is low: an observational study. , 2008, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy.

[8]  N. D. de Morton,et al.  Clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index in healthy, community-dwelling older adults. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[10]  G. Kwakkel Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  L. E. Powell,et al.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[12]  Tahir Masud,et al.  The effectiveness of virtual reality interventions in improving balance in adults with impaired balance compared with standard or no treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  Klaus Hauer,et al.  Evaluation of the incidental and planned activity questionnaire for older people , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[14]  Gavin Andrews,et al.  Normative Data for the 12 Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  H. Handoll,et al.  Mobilisation strategies after hip fracture surgery in adults. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  G. Mead,et al.  Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Class Training on Walking Competency After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2009, Stroke.

[18]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[19]  M. Granat,et al.  The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[20]  Shekhar Saxena,et al.  On the development and psychometric testing of the WHO screening instrument to assess disablement in the general population , 1999 .

[21]  Deborah Kendzierski,et al.  Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two Validation Studies , 1991 .

[22]  Julie Ratcliffe,et al.  Measuring technology self efficacy: reliability and construct validity of a modified computer self efficacy scale in a clinical rehabilitation setting , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  James G Wright,et al.  The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  M. Granat,et al.  The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[25]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[26]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[27]  David M Walton,et al.  A “Wii” bit of fun: The effects of adding Nintendo Wii® Bowling to a standard exercise regimen for residents of long-term care with upper extremity dysfunction , 2011, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[28]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[30]  K. J. Miller,et al.  Effectiveness and feasibility of virtual reality and gaming system use at home by older adults for enabling physical activity to improve health-related domains: a systematic review. , 2014, Age and ageing.

[31]  G. Lewis,et al.  Virtual reality games for movement rehabilitation in neurological conditions: how do we meet the needs and expectations of the users? , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[32]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[33]  A. Betker,et al.  Video game-based exercises for balance rehabilitation: a single-subject design. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  Michelle Pickrell,et al.  Interactive Rehabilitation Tiles , 2014 .

[35]  Meredith Smith,et al.  Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance , 2015 .

[36]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  Physical Activity in Hospitalised Stroke Patients , 2011, Stroke research and treatment.

[37]  Keith D. Hill,et al.  A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients : Reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly , 1996 .

[38]  R. Cumming,et al.  Effective Exercise for the Prevention of Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[39]  A. Betker,et al.  Game-based Exercises for Dynamic Short-Sitting Balance Rehabilitation of People With Chronic Spinal Cord and Traumatic Brain Injuries , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[40]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[41]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[42]  F. Q. Ribeiro The meta-analysis , 2017, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[43]  S. Lord,et al.  Exercise effect on dynamic stability in older women: a randomized controlled trial. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[44]  H. Handoll,et al.  Mobilisation strategies after hip fracture surgery in adults. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[45]  D. Moher,et al.  Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  T. Tombaugh Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. , 2004, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[47]  G. Salem,et al.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[48]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[49]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[50]  Wayne Dite,et al.  Additional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. , 2004, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[51]  D. Rennie,et al.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. , 2013, Annals of internal medicine.

[52]  Jacqueline Kerr,et al.  Exergames for subsyndromal depression in older adults: a pilot study of a novel intervention. , 2010, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[53]  N. Taylor,et al.  The de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) provides a valid method for measuring and monitoring the mobility of patients making the transition from hospital to the community: an observational study. , 2011, Journal of physiotherapy.

[54]  Roberto Gatti,et al.  Rehabilitation that incorporates virtual reality is more effective than standard rehabilitation for improving walking speed, balance and mobility after stroke: a systematic review. , 2015, Journal of physiotherapy.

[55]  M. Crotty,et al.  Video and computer-based interactive exercises are safe and improve task-specific balance in geriatric and neurological rehabilitation: a randomised trial. , 2016, Journal of physiotherapy.

[56]  Rachel Proffitt,et al.  Development of an Interactive Game-Based Rehabilitation Tool for Dynamic Balance Training , 2010, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[57]  R. Fortinsky,et al.  Effects of a Multicomponent Intervention on Functional Outcomes and Process of Care in Hospitalized Older Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) in a Community Hospital , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.