Subcortical Plasticity Following Perceptual Learning in a Pitch Discrimination Task

Practice can lead to dramatic improvements in the discrimination of auditory stimuli. In this study, we investigated changes of the frequency-following response (FFR), a subcortical component of the auditory evoked potentials, after a period of pitch discrimination training. Twenty-seven adult listeners were trained for 10 h on a pitch discrimination task using one of three different complex tone stimuli. One had a static pitch contour, one had a rising pitch contour, and one had a falling pitch contour. Behavioral measures of pitch discrimination and FFRs for all the stimuli were measured before and after the training phase for these participants, as well as for an untrained control group (n = 12). Trained participants showed significant improvements in pitch discrimination compared to the control group for all three trained stimuli. These improvements were partly specific for stimuli with the same pitch modulation (dynamic vs. static) and with the same pitch trajectory (rising vs. falling) as the trained stimulus. Also, the robustness of FFR neural phase locking to the sound envelope increased significantly more in trained participants compared to the control group for the static and rising contour, but not for the falling contour. Changes in FFR strength were partly specific for stimuli with the same pitch modulation (dynamic vs. static) of the trained stimulus. Changes in FFR strength, however, were not specific for stimuli with the same pitch trajectory (rising vs. falling) as the trained stimulus. These findings indicate that even relatively low-level processes in the mature auditory system are subject to experience-related change.

[1]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[2]  Erika Skoe,et al.  Plasticity in the Adult Human Auditory Brainstem following Short-term Linguistic Training , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Jun Yan,et al.  Corticofugal Modulation of Initial Sound Processing in the Brain , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  F. E. Satterthwaite An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946, Biometrics.

[6]  Yisheng Xu,et al.  Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem , 2006, Neuroreport.

[7]  T. Dau The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Jayaganesh Swaminathan,et al.  Pitch encoding in speech and nonspeech contexts in the human auditory brainstem , 2008, Neuroreport.

[9]  J. Durrant,et al.  The frequency-following response and the onset response: evaluation of frequency specificity using a forward-masking paradigm. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[10]  T. Hensch Critical period regulation. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  Nobuo Suga,et al.  Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Pitch perception: Neural Coding and Perception , 2005 .

[13]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Virtual pitch in a computational physiological model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Nicole M. Russo,et al.  Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  E. Chang,et al.  Critical Period Window for Spectral Tuning Defined in the Primary Auditory Cortex (A1) in the Rat , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Gavin M. Bidelman,et al.  Cross-domain Effects of Music and Language Experience on the Representation of Pitch in the Human Auditory Brainstem , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Does practice shape the brain? , 1998, Nature.

[19]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Cariani,et al.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  A. Krishnan,et al.  The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[22]  J. Winer Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems , 2005, Hearing Research.

[23]  A. Huarte,et al.  Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants. , 1999, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[24]  Victoria M Bajo,et al.  The descending corticocollicular pathway mediates learning-induced auditory plasticity , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Overview : The present and future of pitch , 2005 .

[26]  A. Oxenham,et al.  The psychophysics of pitch , 2005 .

[27]  N. Kraus,et al.  Learning to Encode Timing: Mechanisms of Plasticity in the Auditory Brainstem , 2009, Neuron.

[28]  J. Swaminathan,et al.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem , 2009, Neuroreport.

[29]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[30]  Stephen J. Eady Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: Tone language versus stress language , 1981 .

[31]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: evidence for the locus of brainstem sources. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  D. Ladd,et al.  Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. Fay,et al.  Pitch : neural coding and perception , 2005 .

[34]  A. Krishnan,et al.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns , 2009, Brain and Language.

[35]  S. Amitay FORWARD AND REVERSE HIERARCHIES IN AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL LEARNING , 2009 .

[36]  Edward F Chang,et al.  Environmental Noise Retards Auditory Cortical Development , 2003, Science.

[37]  L. Yang,et al.  Differential response properties to amplitude modulated signals in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus of the mustache bat and the roles of GABAergic inhibition. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  H. Snieder,et al.  Genetic correlates of musical pitch recognition in humans. , 2001, Science.

[39]  Robert V Harrison,et al.  Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. , 2005, Developmental psychobiology.

[40]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  Phase-locked responses to pure tones in the inferior colliculus. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Nicolas Grimault,et al.  Evidence for two pitch encoding mechanisms using a selective auditory training paradigm , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  A. Thornton,et al.  Neural Correlates of Perceptual Learning in the Auditory Brainstem: Efferent Activity Predicts and Reflects Improvement at a Speech-in-Noise Discrimination Task , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Satterthwaite Fe An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[44]  R. M. Burger,et al.  Analysis of the role of inhibition in shaping responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the inferior colliculus. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Adaptive plasticity in brainstem of adult listeners following earplug-induced deprivation. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  S. Eady,et al.  Differences in the F0 Patterns of Speech: Tone Language Versus Stress Language , 1981 .

[47]  Nobuo Suga,et al.  Role of corticofugal feedback in hearing , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[48]  N. McLachlan A computational model of human pitch strength and height judgments , 2009, Hearing Research.

[49]  Jayaganesh Swaminathan,et al.  Experience-dependent Enhancement of Linguistic Pitch Representation in the Brainstem Is Not Specific to a Speech Context , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Tests for Homogeneity of Variances, with Applications to the Outer Continental Shelf Bidding Data , 1981 .