Fast tomographic reconstruction strategy for diffuse optical tomography.

Diffuse Optical Tomography (DOT) has been growing significantly in the past two decades as a promising tool for in-vivo and non-invasive imaging of tissues using near-infrared light. It can improve our ability to probe complex biologic interactions dynamically and to study disease and treatment responses over time in near real time. Recent advances on the transfer of techniques from laboratory to clinics have led to the development of various diagnostic applications such as imaging of the female breast and infant brain. The potential value of the promising tool, however, can be limited by the reconstruction time for tomographically imaging tissue optical properties. The current solution procedure in DOT consumes a considerable amount of time due to discretization of the problem domain and nonlinear nature of tissue optical properties. It is becoming ever more important to develop faster imaging tools as measurement data sets increase in size as a result of the application of newer generation instruments. Here we provide a fast solution strategy that significantly reduces imaging effort for DOT. The fast imaging strategy adopts advanced model-order reduction (MOR) techniques for reducing system complexity, while preserving (to the greatest possible extent) system input-output behavior for the forward problem. Our results demonstrate that the MOR-based imaging method can be an order of magnitude faster than the conventional approach while maintaining a relatively small error tolerance. The goal is to develop inexpensive, noninvasive imaging system that can run at patient's bedside in real time and produce data continuously over a long period of time.

[1]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  Analysis of Power Magnetic Components With Nonlinear Static Hysteresis: Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Model Reduction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  B. Pogue,et al.  Tutorial on diffuse light transport. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Mesh-based enhancement schemes in diffuse optical tomography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  Analysis of power magnetic components with nonlinear static hysteresis: finite-element formulation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[5]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Dictionary design for text image compression with JBIG2 , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Joel R. Phillips,et al.  Projection-based approaches for model reduction of weakly nonlinear, time-varying systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[7]  M. Schweiger,et al.  A finite element approach for modeling photon transport in tissue. , 1993, Medical physics.

[8]  Jacob K. White,et al.  A trajectory piecewise-linear approach to model order reduction and fast simulation of nonlinear circuits and micromachined devices , 2001, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design. ICCAD 2001. IEEE/ACM Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.01CH37281).

[9]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Image analysis methods for diffuse optical tomography. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  B. Pogue,et al.  Multiwavelength three-dimensional near-infrared tomography of the breast: initial simulation, phantom, and clinical results. , 2003, Applied optics.

[11]  J. Ripoll,et al.  Fast analytical approximation for arbitrary geometries in diffuse optical tomography. , 2002, Optics letters.

[12]  B. Pogue,et al.  Weight-matrix structured regularization provides optimal generalized least-squares estimate in diffuse optical tomography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Spatially varying optical property reconstruction using a finite element diffusion equation approximation. , 1995, Medical physics.

[14]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Critical computational aspects of near infrared circular tomographic imaging: Analysis of measurement number, mesh resolution and reconstruction basis. , 2006, Optics express.

[15]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Nonlinear multigrid algorithms for Bayesian optical diffusion tomography , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  David A Boas,et al.  Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management. , 2008, Medical physics.

[17]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Implementation of a computationally efficient least-squares algorithm for highly under-determined three-dimensional diffuse optical tomography problems. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  B. Pogue,et al.  Combining near-infrared tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to study in vivo breast tissue: implementation of a Laplacian-type regularization to incorporate magnetic resonance structure. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[19]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  S R Arridge,et al.  Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Computational aspects of diffuse optical tomography , 2003, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[22]  Loc Vu-Quoc,et al.  Efficient simulation of coupled circuit-field problems: generalized Falk method , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[23]  Steven A. Cummer,et al.  An orthogonal projection and regularization technique for magnetospheric radio tomography , 2006 .

[24]  S. Arridge,et al.  Optical imaging in medicine: II. Modelling and reconstruction , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.