An effective determination of the minimum circumscribed circle and maximum inscribed circle using the subzone division approach

Aiming to develop a more effective circularity evaluation method that satisfies the definition of a particular reference circle criterion, this paper proposes a strategy to determine the minimum circumscribed circle (MCC) and maximum inscribed circle (MIC) using the subzone division approach. The whole circumference zone space that encloses all the sampling data points is divided into different subzones to determine the target candidate feature points, which are used for constructing the MCC or MIC. The first feature point of the MCC/MIC is evaluated according to the farthest/nearest distance from the center of the least squares circle (LSC) within the whole circumference subzone. Subzone with a 120° central angle is designated in the direction of the first feature point that is mapped about the center of the LSC. The second candidate feature point is constrained and determined within this subzone. The third subzone, which contains the third feature point, is formed in the direction of the first and second feature points that are mapped about the center of the LSC. The mathematical model of the MCC or MIC is then constructed using these three feature points. Experimental examples (using five different datasets) and a comparison with previous studies demonstrate that the proposed method yields the exact solution for the MIC and MCC in only 1–2 iterations.

[1]  Jose Mathew,et al.  Comparative study of roundness evaluation algorithms for coordinate measurement and form data , 2018 .

[2]  M. S. Shunmugam,et al.  Evaluation of circularity from coordinate and form data using computational geometric techniques , 2000 .

[3]  Xiuming Li,et al.  A joint method for the maximum inscribed circle and minimum circumscribed circle , 2016 .

[4]  Paolo Chiabert,et al.  Evaluation of roundness tolerance zone using measurements performed on manufactured parts: A probabilistic approach , 2018 .

[5]  Hsi-Yung Feng,et al.  An accurate and efficient algorithm for determining minimum circumscribed circles and spheres from discrete data points , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Zhaoyao Shi,et al.  The relationship between the minimum zone circle and the maximum inscribed circle and the minimum circumscribed circle , 2009 .

[7]  Cao Zhimin,et al.  Roundness deviation evaluation method based on statistical analysis of local least square circles , 2017 .

[8]  Yu Zheng A simple unified branch-and-bound algorithm for minimum zone circularity and sphericity errors , 2020, Measurement Science and Technology.

[9]  Han Ding,et al.  A steepest descent algorithm for circularity evaluation , 2003, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  Michele Lanzetta,et al.  Fast genetic algorithm for roundness evaluation by the minimum zone tolerance (MZT) method , 2011 .

[11]  N. Venkaiah,et al.  Minimum zone evaluation of roundness using hybrid global search approach , 2017 .

[12]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Minimum Circumscribed Circle and Maximum Inscribed Circle of Roundness Deviation Evaluation With Intersecting Chord Method , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[13]  E. S. Gadelmawla,et al.  Simple and efficient algorithms for roundness evaluation from the coordinate measurement data , 2010 .

[14]  Jyunping Huang,et al.  A new strategy for circularity problems , 2001 .

[15]  Kuang-Chao Fan,et al.  Development of a roundness measuring system for microspheres , 2014 .

[16]  Zahurin Samad,et al.  Roundness error evaluation of cold embossed hole based on profile measurement technique , 2015 .

[17]  Lei Wang,et al.  Design of roundness measurement model with multi-systematic error for cylindrical components with large radius. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[18]  Burak Beyhan,et al.  An algorithm for maximum inscribed circle based on Voronoi diagrams and geometrical properties , 2020, J. Geogr. Syst..

[19]  Xiuming Li,et al.  Simple and efficient algorithm for the roundness error from polar coordinate measurement data. , 2020, The Review of scientific instruments.

[20]  Xiulan Wen,et al.  An effective genetic algorithm for circularity error unified evaluation , 2006 .