Belief Revision in Accounting: A Literature Review of the Belief-Adjustment Model

The belief-adjustment model has been an integral part of accounting research in belief revision, especially in the examination of order effects. Hogarth and Einhorn ((1992) Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1–55) created the belief-adjustment model to serve as a theoretical framework for studying individuals’ decision-making processes. The model examines several aspects of decision-making, such as encoding, response mode, and task factors. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive examination of the accounting studies that have used the theoretical framework of the belief-adjustment model in auditing, tax, and financial accounting contexts. Roberts’ ((1998) Journal of the American Taxation Association, 20, 78–121) model of tax accountants’ decision-making is used as a guideline to organize the research into categories. By using Roberts’ categorization, we can better sort out the mixed results of some prior studies and also expand the review to include a more comprehensive look at the model and its application to accounting. While many variables have been examined with respect to their effect on accounting professionals’ belief revisions, most studies examine them in isolation and do not consider the interaction effects that these variables may have. Our framework also identifies areas of the belief-adjustment model that need further research.

[1]  E. Michael Bamber,et al.  An examination of the descriptive validity of the belief-adjustment model and alternative attitudes to evidence in auditing , 1997 .

[2]  Gary S. Monroe,et al.  An examination of order effects in auditors’ inherent risk assessments , 2000 .

[3]  S. Ahlawat,et al.  Order effects and memory for evidence in individual versus group decision making in auditing , 1999 .

[4]  Terry L. Campbell,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION ORDER AND HYPOTHESIS-TESTING STRATEGIES ON AUDITORS' JUDGMENTS. , 1989 .

[5]  S. Fiske,et al.  The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition , 1983 .

[6]  The Effect of Experience on Order and Recency Bias in Decision Making by Professional Accountants , 1998 .

[7]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[8]  Lola L. Lopes.  Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian inference , 1985 .

[9]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Evidence-responsiveness in professional judgment: Effects of positive versus negative evidence and presentation mode , 1990 .

[10]  K. Trotman,et al.  Order effects and recency: where do we go from here? , 2000 .

[11]  Brad Tuttle,et al.  An examination of market efficiency: Information order effects in a laboratory market , 1997 .

[12]  Buck K.W. Pei,et al.  The influence of information presentation order on professional tax judgment , 1990 .

[13]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  PROPOSITIONS ABOUT THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN PUBLIC ACCOUNTING , 1984 .

[14]  Mario J. Maletta,et al.  Primacy Effects and the Role of Risk in Auditor Belief-Revision Processes , 1999 .

[15]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Debiasing Audit Judgment With Accountability - A Framework And Experimental Results , 1993 .

[16]  Theodore J. Mock,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Belief Revision Models in Auditing , 1999 .

[17]  G. Pitz,et al.  Sequential effects in the revision of subjective probabilities. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[19]  Ira Solomon,et al.  Experience, expertise and expert-performance research in public accounting , 1989 .

[20]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[21]  Matthew J. Anderson,et al.  A comparative analysis of information search and evaluation behavior of professional and non-professional financial analysts , 1988 .

[22]  M. M. Chan.  The moderating effects of cognitive style and recency effects on the auditors′ belief revision process , 1995 .

[23]  Robert Libby,et al.  Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation , 1993 .

[24]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[25]  C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Explanation and Counter-Explanation on the Development and Use of Social Theories. , 1986 .

[26]  S. K. Asare,et al.  The auditors' going concern opinion decision: Interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence. , 1989 .

[27]  Eric N. Johnson.  Effects of information order, group assistance, and experience on auditors' sequential belief revision , 1995 .

[28]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Andrew D. Cuccia,et al.  The Role of Decision Strategies in Understanding Professionals'Susceptibility to Judgment Biases , 2000 .

[30]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[31]  Buck K.W. Pei,et al.  Tax Professionals Belief Revision: The Effects of Information Presentation Sequence, Client Preference, and Domain Experience , 1992 .