Learning With Fewer Images via Image Clustering: Application to Intravascular OCT Image Segmentation

Deep learning based methods are routinely used to segment various structures of interest in varied medical imaging modalities. Acquiring annotations for a large number of images requires a skilled analyst, and the process is both time consuming and challenging. Our approach to reduce effort is to reduce the number of images needing detailed annotation. For intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) image pullbacks, we tested 10% to 100% of training images derived from two schemes: equally-spaced image subsampling and deep-learning- based image clustering. The first strategy involves selecting images at equally spaced intervals from the volume, accounting for the high spatial correlation between neighboring images. In clustering, we used an autoencoder to create a deep feature space representation, performed k-medoids clustering, and then used the cluster medians for training. For coronary calcifications, a baseline U-net model was trained on all images from volumes of interest (VOIs) and compared with fewer images from the sub-sampling strategies. For a given sampling ratio, the clustering based method performed better or similar as compared to the equally spaced sampling approach (e.g., with 10% of images, mean F1 score for calcific class increased from 0.52 to 0.63, with equal spacing and with clustering, respectively). Additionally, for a fixed number of training images, sampling images from more VOIs performed better than otherwise. In conclusion, we recommend the clustering based approach to annotate a small fraction of images, creating a baseline model, which potentially can be improved further by annotating images selected using methods described in active learning research.

[1]  Danny Z. Chen,et al.  Biomedical Image Segmentation via Representative Annotation , 2019, AAAI.

[2]  Shunxing Bao,et al.  SynSeg-Net: Synthetic Segmentation Without Target Modality Ground Truth , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Kaiming He,et al.  Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[4]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[5]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[6]  Nima Tajbakhsh,et al.  Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentation , 2019, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Jan D’hooge,et al.  Automated tissue characterization of in vivo atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular optical coherence tomography images , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[8]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Cost-Sensitive Active Learning for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection , 2018, MICCAI.

[9]  David Wilson,et al.  Coronary calcification segmentation in intravascular OCT images using deep learning: application to calcification scoring , 2019, Journal of medical imaging.

[10]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[11]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Bolei Zhou,et al.  Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[13]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[14]  David L Wilson,et al.  Automated plaque characterization using deep learning on coronary intravascular optical coherence tomographic images. , 2019, Biomedical optics express.

[15]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning , 2019, Journal of Big Data.

[16]  F. Cheriet,et al.  Deep feature learning for automatic tissue classification of coronary artery using optical coherence tomography. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[17]  Xavier Giró-i-Nieto,et al.  Cost-Effective Active Learning for Melanoma Segmentation , 2017, NIPS 2017.

[18]  Hao Chen,et al.  Synergistic Image and Feature Adaptation: Towards Cross-Modality Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentation , 2019, AAAI.

[19]  Jie Li,et al.  A sparse annotation strategy based on attention-guided active learning for 3D medical image segmentation , 2019, ArXiv.

[20]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[21]  Nima Tajbakhsh,et al.  Surrogate Supervision for Medical Image Analysis: Effective Deep Learning From Limited Quantities of Labeled Data , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019).

[22]  David Wilson,et al.  Deep neural networks for A-line-based plaque classification in coronary intravascular optical coherence tomography images , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[23]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  Discriminative Localization in CNNs for Weakly-Supervised Segmentation of Pulmonary Nodules , 2017, MICCAI.

[24]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[25]  Youbao Tang,et al.  Accurate Weakly Supervised Deep Lesion Segmentation on CT Scans: Self-Paced 3D Mask Generation from RECIST , 2018, ArXiv.

[26]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Star Shape Prior in Fully Convolutional Networks for Skin Lesion Segmentation , 2018, MICCAI.

[27]  David L. Wilson,et al.  Fully automated plaque characterization in intravascular OCT images using hybrid convolutional and lumen morphology features , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning , 2015, ICML.