ODSS and the twilight of the decision support movement: social segmentation and the legacy of infrastructure

The ODSS concept is new, and pulls into focus and into confusion aspects of the underlying decision support concept. The authors trace this concept's roots to the generalized management-as-decisionmaking (MAD) ideology that grew up following WW II and subsequently came to dominate many aspects of management thought. They liken the MAD movement to the medieval morality play, in both structure and evolution. The twilight of the MAD movement result from the same causes that eclipsed the morality play in the early days of the Renaissance. A review of ODSS literature from recent sources shows that the breakdown of the rhetoric of decision support corresponds to the general weakening of the MAD movement, and presages a rhetorical reconstruction of the aims and objectives of those who seek to apply information technologies to the social interactions among individuals and groups in organizations. They review the legacy of infrastructure left by the MAD and Decision Support movements, and make a general call for innovation and tolerance in the ongoing rhetorical reconstruction.<<ETX>>

[1]  Neil W. Chamberlain Management in motion : the corporate decision-making process as applied to the transfer of employees , 1950 .

[2]  David Bevington From "Mankind" to Marlowe: Growth of Structure in the Popular Drama of Tudor England. , 1962 .

[3]  N. Carter General and Industrial Management , 1986 .

[4]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Organizational strategies for personal computing in decision support systems , 1981 .

[5]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In search of excellence : lessons from America's best-run companies , 1983 .

[6]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  A design for an infrastructure to support organizational decision-making , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  E. B. Swanson Distributed decision support systems: a perspective , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  John Leslie King,et al.  Conceptual foundations for the development of organizational decision support systems , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Four goals for the design of organizational information support systems , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  W. E. Walker,et al.  Differences between building a traditional DSS and an ODSS: lessons from the Air Force's Enlisted Force Management System , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Situations vs. standards in long-term, wide-scale decision-making: the case of the International Classification of Diseases , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  K. Ruhleder,et al.  The academic collaboratory as a bridge across space, time, and social worlds , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Design of organizational decision support systems: the use of a data extraction scheme to facilitate model-database communication , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  G. Thompson,et al.  Myth and Rationality in Management Decision-Making: The Evolution of American Railroad Product Costing, 1870–1970 , 1991 .

[15]  Joey F. George The Conceptualization and Development of Organizational Decision Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Organizational Decision Support Systems , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..