Coupler force reduction method for multiple-unit trains using a new hierarchical control system

During traction and braking of multiple-unit trains, substantial longitudinal dynamic forces might occur in couplers due to the non-optimal distribution of traction and braking forces generated by self-propelled carriages. These dynamic forces might create shocks affecting the reduction of endurance of the weakest train structural components primarily. Thus, the overall operational safety of the train is also lowered. The purpose of the paper is to develop a new control system to supervise the activities related to the longitudinal dynamics of each train carriage in a multiple-unit train to reduce the longitudinal coupler forces acting during train traction and braking. The hierarchical structure of the control system consists of two levels. The first master level of control works like standard cruise control. However, the reduction of longitudinal coupler forces is achieved by applying a second level of slave control systems with a control configuration of feedback compensation.

[1]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Ride performance of a high speed rail vehicle using controlled semi active suspension system , 2017 .

[2]  Razvan Andrei Oprea,et al.  A discontinuous model simulation for train start-up dynamics , 2018 .

[3]  Boris J. Lurie,et al.  Classical Feedback Control with Nonlinear Multi-Loop Systems , 2019 .

[4]  Wirote Sangtungtong,et al.  The two parallel PID controllers with their output-weighting adaptation , 2013, 2013 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology.

[5]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  Establishment and verification of three-dimensional dynamic model for heavy-haul train–track coupled system , 2016 .

[6]  Maksym Spiryagin,et al.  Traction modelling in train dynamics , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit.

[7]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  A common framework for anti-windup, bumpless transfer and reliable designs , 2002, Autom..

[8]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Ride comfort of a higher speed rail vehicle using a magnetorheological suspension system , 2018 .

[9]  Xinbiao Xiao,et al.  A 3D model for coupling dynamics analysis of high-speed train/track system , 2014 .

[10]  Maksym Spiryagin,et al.  Longitudinal train dynamics: an overview , 2016 .

[11]  Yongduan Song,et al.  Adaptive backstepping control of train systems with traction/braking dynamics and uncertain resistive forces , 2011 .

[12]  Satoru Sone.  Comparison of the technologies of the Japanese Shinkansen and Chinese High-speed Railways , 2015 .

[13]  Ebrahim Esmailzadeh,et al.  Longitudinal dynamics of freight trains , 2009 .

[14]  E. M. Shaban,et al.  A novel discrete PID+ controller applied to higher order/time delayed nonlinear systems with practical implementation , 2018, International Journal of Dynamics and Control.

[15]  J. Jackiewicz,et al.  Optimal Control of Automotive Multivariable Dynamical Systems , 2017 .

[16]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  Vehicle–Track Coupled Dynamics , 2020 .

[17]  Chaoqun Ma,et al.  Dominant Pole Placement with Modified PID Controllers , 2019 .

[18]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Challenges in Rail Vehicle-Track Modeling and Simulation , 2015 .

[19]  Pavel Zítek,et al.  PID Controller Tuning via Dominant Pole Placement in Comparison with Ziegler-Nichols Tuning , 2019, IFAC-PapersOnLine.

[20]  Sunil Kumar Sharma.  Multibody analysis of longitudinal train dynamics on the passenger ride performance due to brake application , 2019 .

[21]  H. Marquez.  Nonlinear Control Systems: Analysis and Design , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[22]  Wei Shan,et al.  Longitudinal train dynamics of electric multiple units under rescue , 2017 .