Comparison of Six Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound Devices: Precision and Hip Fracture Discrimination
暂无分享,去创建一个
H. K. Genant | D. Hans | C. Wu | H. Genant | Y. Lu | T. Fuerst | C. Njeh | D. Hans | B. Fan | Ying Lu | J. Li | J. Li | C. Y. Wu | C. F. Njeh | B. Fan | T. Fuerst | Y. Q. He | E. Tsuda-Futami | Y. Lu | Y. He | E. Tsuda-Futami | Jian-mei Li
[1] M. Reznikoff,et al. Bootstrapping: a tool for clinical research. , 1990, Journal of clinical psychology.
[2] L. Rosenthall. Influence of Bone Quality on Precision of Calcaneal Ultrasonometry , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.
[3] T A Einhorn,et al. Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? , 1996, Bone.
[4] G Berger,et al. In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.
[5] J. Cauley,et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1997, Archives of Internal Medicine.
[6] G M Owen,et al. Factors affecting the in vivo precision of broad-band ultrasonic attenuation. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.
[7] K. Wear,et al. Measurements of phase velocity and group velocity in human calcaneus. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[8] H K Genant,et al. Assessment of bone mineral at appendicular sites in females with fractures of the proximal femur. , 1998, Bone.
[9] J. Kanis,et al. Short-term Reproducibility of Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density in the Elderly , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.
[10] P. Rich,et al. Water Bath and Contact Methods in Ultrasonic Evaluation of Bone , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.
[11] J. Hanley,et al. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.
[12] J. Cunningham,et al. Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.
[13] S. Majumdar,et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[14] E. Orwoll,et al. Precision and Discriminatory Ability of Calcaneal Bone Assessment Technologies , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[15] J. Li,et al. An evaluation of a new gel-coupled ultrasound device for the quantitative assessment of bone. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.
[16] P. Laugier,et al. Ultrasound Measurement on the Calcaneus: Influence of Immersion Time and Rotation of the Foot , 1999, Osteoporosis International.
[17] J. Hanley,et al. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.
[18] F. Tylavsky,et al. Utility of Ultrasound to Assess Risk of Fracture , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
[19] H. Genant,et al. Quantitative ultrasound. , 1995, European journal of radiology.
[20] W. Hayes,et al. Trochanteric bone mineral density is associated with type of hip fracture in the elderly , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[21] G. Blake,et al. Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. , 1997, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[22] C C Glüer,et al. Comparisons of Noninvasive Bone Mineral Measurements in Assessing Age‐Related Loss, Fracture Discrimination, and Diagnostic Classification , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[23] J. Swets,et al. Assessment of diagnostic technologies. , 1979, Science.
[24] C. Glüer,et al. Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis: Expert Agreement on Current Status , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[25] J. R. Koehler,et al. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .
[26] S. Cummings,et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures , 1993, The Lancet.
[27] G. Breart,et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.
[28] P W Thompson,et al. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel predicts wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures in women age 45-75 years. , 1998, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.
[29] H. Genant,et al. Quantitative ultrasound in bone status assessment. , 1998, Revue du rhumatisme.
[30] M. Jergas,et al. Quantitative CT assessment of the lumbar spine and radius in patients with osteoporosis. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[31] M. Munz,et al. Bone Mineral Density of Opposing Hips Using Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Single-Beam and Fan-Beam Design , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.
[32] R. Speller,et al. Comparison of ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the calcaneus. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.
[33] H. Genant,et al. Factors Affecting Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation Results of the Calcaneus Using a Gel-Coupled Quantitative Ultrasound Scanning System , 1999, Osteoporosis International.
[34] L. Bouter,et al. The Influence of Physical Activity and Fractures on Ultrasound Parameters in Elderly People , 1998, Osteoporosis International.
[35] G Van der Perre,et al. A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.
[36] C C Glüer,et al. Monitoring Skeletal Changes by Radiological Techniques , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[37] S. Johansson,et al. Calcaneal ultrasound measurements are determined by age and physical activity. Studies in two Swedish random population samples , 2000, Journal of Internal Medicine.