SoftHand at the CYBATHLON: a user’s experience

BackgroundRoughly one-quarter of upper limb prosthesis users reject their prosthesis. Reasons for rejection range from comfort, to cost, aesthetics, function, and more. This paper follows a single user from training with and testing of a novel upper-limb myoelectric prosthesis (the SoftHand Pro) for participation in the CYBATHLON rehearsal to training for and competing in the CYBATHLON 2016 with a figure-of-nine harness controlled powered prosthesis (SoftHand Pro-H) to explore the feasibility and usability of a flexible anthropomorphic prosthetic hand.MethodsThe CYBATHLON pilot took part in multiple in-lab training sessions with the SoftHand Pro and SoftHand Pro-H; these sessions focused on basic control and use of the prosthetic devices and direct training of the tasks in the CYBATHLON. He used these devices in competition in the Powered Arm Prosthesis Race in the CYBATHLON rehearsal and 2016 events.ResultsIn training for the CYBATHLON rehearsal, the subject was able to quickly improve performance with the myoelectric SHP despite typically using a body-powered prosthetic hook. The subject improved further with additional training using the figure-of-nine harness-controlled SHPH in preparation for the CYBATHLON. The Pilot placed 3rd (out of 4) in the rehearsal. In the CYBATHLON, he placed 5th (out of 12) and was one of only two pilots who successfully completed all tasks in the competition, having the second-highest score overall.ConclusionsResults with the SoftHand Pro and Pro-H suggest it to be a viable alternative to existing anthropomorphic hands and show that the unique flexibility of the hand is easily learned and exploited.

[1]  Sven Behnke,et al.  Robot Competitions Ideal Benchmarks for Robotics Research , 2006 .

[2]  Alberto Esquenazi,et al.  Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  S. Millstein,et al.  Prosthetic Use in Adult Upper Limb Amputees: A Comparison of the Body Powered and Electrically Powered Prostheses , 1986, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  M Jason Highsmith,et al.  Design and Fabrication of a Passive-Function, Cylindrical Grasp Terminal Device , 2009, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  J. Webster,et al.  Acquired limb deficiencies. 3. Prosthetic components, prescriptions, and indications. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  The SoftHand Pro: Translation from Robotic Hand to Prosthetic Prototype , 2017 .

[8]  Stephanie L Carey,et al.  Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Robert Riener,et al.  The Cybathlon promotes the development of assistive technology for people with physical disabilities , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  M. J. Highsmith,et al.  Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  D. Datta,et al.  Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency–acquired and congenital , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  D. Silcox,et al.  Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  G. Kejlaa,et al.  Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[14]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  Passive prosthetic hands and tools: A literature review , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.