Autonomy All the Way Down: Systems and Dynamics in Quantum Bayesianism
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Wojciech H. Zurek,et al. Decoherence, einselection and the existential interpretation (the rough guide) , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[2] H. Everett. "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .
[3] W. Zurek. Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? , 1981 .
[4] Simon Kochen,et al. The Free Will Theorem , 2006 .
[5] G. G. Stokes. "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[6] S. Pinker. How the Mind Works , 1999, Philosophy after Darwin.
[7] H. S. Allen. The Quantum Theory , 1928, Nature.
[8] C. Fuchs,et al. A Quantum-Bayesian Route to Quantum-State Space , 2009, 0912.4252.
[9] R. Giere. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science , 2003 .
[10] A. Tversky,et al. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.
[11] Nicolas Gisin,et al. Can Relativity be Considered Complete? From Newtonian Nonlocality to Quantum Nonlocality and Beyond , 2005 .
[12] E. Joos,et al. The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment , 1985 .
[13] H. Zeh. On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory , 1970 .
[14] John William Nicholson,et al. The Constitution of Atoms and Molecules , 1914, Nature.
[15] I. Stamatescu,et al. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 1996 .
[16] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .
[17] Edward F. Moore,et al. Gedanken-Experiments on Sequential Machines , 1956 .
[18] N. Mermin,et al. The Ithaca interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1996, quant-ph/9609013.
[19] J. Bub. Why the quantum , 2004, quant-ph/0402149.
[20] Nicolaas P. Landsman. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition , 2009 .
[21] C. Fuchs,et al. Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.
[22] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[23] Wojciech Hubert Zurek,et al. Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, Envariance, Quantum Darwinism, and the Existential Interpretation , 2007, 0707.2832.
[24] C. Fuchs,et al. Unknown Quantum States: The Quantum de Finetti Representation , 2001, quant-ph/0104088.
[25] David Wallace,et al. Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics , 2008 .
[26] Max Tegmark. Many Worlds in Context , 2009, 0905.2182.
[27] David Poulin,et al. Environment as a Witness: Selective Proliferation of Information and Emergence of Objectivity in a Quantum Universe , 2004 .
[28] Toward a quantum theory of observation , 1973, quant-ph/0306151.
[29] N. P. Landsman. Between classical and quantum , 2005 .
[30] Robert B. Griffiths,et al. A Consistent Quantum Ontology , 2011, 1105.3932.
[31] Refractor. Vision , 2000, The Lancet.
[32] T. Konrad,et al. A remark on Fuchs' bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2008 .
[33] R. Griffiths. Types of quantum information , 2007, 0707.3752.
[34] C. Fuchs. QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism , 2010, 1003.5209.
[35] Maximilian Schlosshauer,et al. Experimental motivation and empirical consistency in minimal no-collapse quantum mechanics , 2006 .
[36] H. D. Zeh. Roots and Fruits of Decoherence , 2006 .
[37] David Wallace,et al. The Quantum Measurement Problem: State of Play , 2007, 0712.0149.
[38] N. Bohr. The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory , 1928, Nature.
[39] Christopher G. Timpson,et al. Quantum Bayesianism: A study , 2008, 0804.2047.
[40] David Wallace,et al. Everett and structure , 2001 .
[41] J. Neumann. Mathematische grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935 .
[42] W. Zurek. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.
[43] W. Zurek,et al. Quantum Darwinism: Entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information , 2005, quant-ph/0505031.
[44] David Poulin,et al. Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness. , 2004, Physical review letters.
[45] Carlton M. Caves,et al. Subjective probability and quantum certainty , 2006 .
[46] Simon Kochen,et al. The Strong Free Will Theorem , 2008, 0807.3286.
[47] C. Fuchs. Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.
[48] Chris Fields,et al. Classical system boundaries cannot be determined within quantum Darwinism , 2010, 1008.0283.
[49] Chris Fields. If Physics Is an Information Science, What Is an Observer? , 2012, Inf..
[50] W. Zurek. Environment-induced superselection rules , 1982 .
[51] D. Deutsch. Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[52] Simon Friederich,et al. How to spell out the epistemic conception of quantum states , 2011, 1101.1975.
[53] Rolf Landauer,et al. Information is a physical entity , 1999 .
[54] Ruediger Schack,et al. Bayesian Conditioning, the Reflection Principle, and Quantum Decoherence ∗ , 2011, 1103.5950.
[55] W. Zurek. Quantum Darwinism , 2009, 0903.5082.
[56] Chris Fields,et al. Quantum Darwinism Requires an Extra-Theoretical Assumption of Encoding Redundancy , 2010, 1003.5136.
[57] O. Sacks,et al. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales , 1985 .
[58] B. Newell. Judgment Under Uncertainty , 2013 .
[59] M. Schlosshauer. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2003, quant-ph/0312059.
[60] A. Galindo,et al. Information and computation: Classical and quantum aspects , 2001, quant-ph/0112105.