Measuring Attention Using Induced Motion

Attention was measured by means of its effect upon induced motion. Perceived horizontal motion was induced in a vertically moving test spot by the physical horizontal motion of inducing objects. All stimuli were in a frontoparallel plane. The induced motion vectored with the physical motion to produce a clockwise or counterclockwise tilt in the apparent path of motion of the test spot. Either a single inducing object or two inducing objects moving in opposite directions were used. Twelve observers were instructed to attend to or to ignore the single inducing object while fixating the test object and, when the two opposing inducing objects were present, to attend to one inducing object while ignoring the other. Tracking of the test spot was visually monitored. The tilt of the path of apparent motion of the test spot was measured by tactile adjustment of a comparison rod. It was found that the measured tilt was substantially larger when the single inducing object was attended rather than ignored. For the two inducing objects, attending to one while ignoring the other clearly increased the effectiveness of the attended inducing object. The results are analyzed in terms of the distinction between voluntary and involuntary attention. The advantages of measuring attention by its effect on induced motion as compared with the use of a precueing procedure, and a hypothesis regarding the role of attention in modifying perceived spatial characteristics are discussed.

[1]  K. Duncker,et al.  Über induzierte Bewegung , 1929 .

[2]  W. Gogel,et al.  EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  W. C. Gogel.  SIZE CUES AND THE ADJACENCY PRINCIPLE. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Cue enhancement as a function of task set , 1967 .

[5]  Leonard Brosgole,et al.  The role of eye movements in the perception of visually induced motion , 1968 .

[6]  W C Gogel,et al.  The sensing of retinal size. , 1969, Vision research.

[7]  L. Festinger,et al.  The effect of attention on brightness contrast and assimilation. , 1970, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  S. Coren,et al.  Differentiation and decrement in the Mueller-Lyer illusion , 1972 .

[9]  E. M. Brussell.  Attention, brightness contrast, and assimilation: The influence of relative area , 1973 .

[10]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency , 1973 .

[11]  L. Festinger,et al.  The Gelb effect: brightness contrast plus attention. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  A. Pressey.  Evidence for the Role of Attentive Fields in the Perception of Illusions , 1974, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  A. Mack,et al.  A reexamination of two-point induced movement , 1975 .

[14]  E R Wist,et al.  Spatial and fixation conditions affecting the temporal course of changes in perceived relative distance , 1976, Psychological research.

[15]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Adjacency and attention as determiners of perceived motion , 1976, Vision Research.

[16]  W C Gogel,et al.  Eye Fixation and Attention as Modifiers of Perceived Distance , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  D H Mershon,et al.  Local autonomy in visual space. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[18]  Experiments on the locus of induced motion , 1977 .

[19]  H Wallach,et al.  Adaptation in motion perception: Alteration of induced motion , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Depth Adjacency and Induced Motion , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  P. Schulman.  Eye movements do not cause induced motion , 1979 .

[22]  A Mack,et al.  Smooth pursuit eye movements: is perceived motion necessary? , 1979, Science.

[23]  Evidence for the Role of Attentive Fields in Masking , 1980, Perception.

[24]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[26]  W. Gogel,et al.  Spatial Induction of Illusory Motion , 1982, Perception.

[27]  Y Tsal,et al.  A Mueller–Lyer Illusion Induced by Selective Attention , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  W. Epstein,et al.  Automatic and attentional components in perception of shape-at-a-slant. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  J M Loomis,et al.  Agreement between indirect measures of perceived distance , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  K D Broota,et al.  Automatic and attentional components in perception of size-at-a-distance , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  J. Findlay,et al.  Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perception of slant-in-depth is automatic , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.