A second-order uncertainty model for target classification using kinematic data

When kinematic data is used for target classification, traditional Bayesian methods often lead to unreasonable results, especially when the target is not maneuvering. We find that this is due to the poor modeling of the uncertain mapping from the target class space to the maneuver feature space. Our proposed second-order uncertainty model gives both a preferable description of the uncertain mapping from the feature space to the class space and a more practical method to calculate the class likelihood under a relaxed dependence assumption. It is also clarified when the classifying features are extracted from a multiple-model filter, the real dynamic mode of a target should be determined to prevent the classifier from being degraded since it is in fact not a stochastic process and cannot be correctly described by multiple models simultaneously. A numerical example demonstrates that a well-formulated Bayesian classifier can produce results as expected.

[1]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Tracking with debiased consistent converted measurements versus EKF , 1993 .

[2]  Wei Mei,et al.  Simultaneous tracking and classification: a modularized scheme , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Henry Leung,et al.  Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer target identification for radar surveillance , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[4]  Branko Ristic,et al.  On target classification using kinematic data , 2004, Inf. Fusion.

[5]  J.A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Automatic target recognition using kinematic priors , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Unbiased Kalman filter using converted measurements: revisit , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[7]  V. Jilkov,et al.  Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part V. Multiple-model methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Unbiased converted measurements for tracking , 1998 .

[9]  Subhash Challa,et al.  Joint target tracking and classification using radar and ESM sensors , 2001 .

[10]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Target identification based on the transferable belief model interpretation of dempster-shafer model , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[11]  P. Smets,et al.  Target classification approach based on the belief function theory , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  M. Moruzzis,et al.  Radar target recognition by fuzzy logic , 1997 .

[13]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Kalman filter and joint tracking and classification based on belief functions in the TBM framework , 2007, Inf. Fusion.

[15]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .