Monitoring subsurface changes over time with cross-well electromagnetic tomographyt1

A fast imaging technique is developed to deduce the spatial conductivity distribution in the earth from low-frequency (> 1 MHz) cross-well electromagnetic measurements. A sinusoidally oscillating, vertically orientated, magnetic dipole employed as a source, and it is assumed that the scattering bodies are azimuthally symmetric about the source dipole axis. The use of this model geometry reduces the 3D vector problem to a more manageable 2D scalar form. Additional efficiency is obtained by using the Born series approximation which is derived from nonlinear integral equations that account for the scattered magnetic fields generated by inhomogeneities embedded in a layered earth. Stabilization of the inversion problem is accomplished through the use of bounding constraints and a regularization method which results in a smooth model that fits the data to the desired noise level. The applicability of cross-well electromagnetics for imaging and monitoring changes caused by subsurface processes has been tested by simulating plumes of conductive fluid with 2D models. The images that result from inverting these synthetic data indicate that the vertical resolution of the method is better than the horizontal, increasing the noise decreases the image resolution, and incorporating a priori knowledge in the form of positivity constraints improves the results. Although higher operating frequencies are usually associated with better resolution, frequencies as low as 100 Hz can produce acceptable images in simulated oilfield environments. The imaging scheme has been applied to data collected during a salt-water injection experiment at the Richmond Field Station test site in Richmond, California. Both the data and the resulting images clearly reveal the presence of the plume and indicate that it is migrating towards the north-northwest rather than spreading symmetrically about the injection well. Applying the imaging code to synthetic data generated by a 3D sheet model verifies the interpretation of these results.

[1]  H. F. Morrison,et al.  Crosswell electromagnetic tomography: System design considerations and field results , 1995 .

[2]  T. Habashy,et al.  Rapid 2.5‐dimensional forward modeling and inversion via a new nonlinear scattering approximation , 1994 .

[3]  M. Deszcz-Pan The crosswell electromagnetic response of layered media , 1994 .

[4]  Tarek M. Habashy,et al.  Influence of steel casings on electromagnetic signals , 1994 .

[5]  D. Alumbaugh,et al.  Iterative Electromagnetic Born Inversion Applied to Earth Conductivity Imaging , 1993 .

[6]  David L. Alumbaugh,et al.  Electromagnetic conductivity imaging with an iterative Born inversion , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  H. F. Morrison,et al.  Audio‐frequency electromagnetic tomography in 2-D , 1993 .

[8]  H. F. Morrison,et al.  Cross-borehole and surface-to-borehole electromagnetic induction for reservoir characterization , 1991 .

[9]  Stephen K. Park,et al.  Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes , 1991 .

[10]  H. Morrison,et al.  Borehole‐to‐surface electrical resistivity monitoring of a salt water injection experiment , 1991 .

[11]  M. Toksöz,et al.  Simultaneous reconstruction of permittivity and conductivity for crosshole geometries , 1990 .

[12]  A. J. Mansure,et al.  Steam-Zone Electrical Characteristics for Geodiagnostic Evaluation of Steamflood Performance , 1990 .

[13]  Q. Zhou Audio-Frequency Electromagnetic Tomography for Reservoir Evaluation , 1989 .

[14]  P. R. Hutt,et al.  Acoustic tomography for monitoring enhanced oil recovery , 1989 .

[15]  E. F. Laine,et al.  Remote monitoring of the steam-flood enhanced oil recovery process , 1987 .

[16]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[17]  M. Worthington,et al.  An introduction to geophysical tomography , 1984 .

[18]  W. Daily Underground oil-shale retort monitoring using geotomography , 1984 .

[19]  James R. Wait,et al.  Fields of a horizontal loop of arbitrary shape buried in a two-layer earth , 1980 .

[20]  C. Stoyer Electromagnetic fields of dipoles in stratified media , 1977 .

[21]  G. E. Archie The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[22]  T. Patzek,et al.  Cleaning up spilled gasoline with steam: Compositional simulations , 1993 .

[23]  Brian R. Spies,et al.  Survey Design Considerations For Cross-Well Electromagnetics , 1992 .

[24]  Gregory A. Newman,et al.  Three-dimensional Electromagnetic Inversion of Insufficient And Inadequate Data , 1992 .

[25]  C. Schenkel,et al.  Cross-borehole Electromagnetic Induction For Steam Flooding Monitoring , 1992 .

[26]  L. J. Dahl,et al.  A Field Test of Electromagnetic Methods For the Detection of Conductive Plumes , 1991 .

[27]  M. Wilt,et al.  Effect of a steel casing on crosshole EM measurement , 1991 .

[28]  H. F. Morrison,et al.  A theoretical study of surface-to-borehole electromagnetic logging in cased holes , 1989 .

[29]  M. Toksöz,et al.  Diffraction tomography and multisource holography applied to seismic imaging , 1987 .

[30]  A. Devaney Geophysical Diffraction Tomography , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  D. T. Davis,et al.  Use of high-frequency electromagnetic waves for mapping an in situ coal gasification burn front , 1979 .

[32]  V. Barthès,et al.  An inverse problem for electromagnetic prospection , 1978 .