Robust EEG/MEG Based Functional Connectivity with the Envelope of the Imaginary Coherence: Sensor Space Analysis

The brain’s functional connectivity (FC) estimated at sensor level from electromagnetic (EEG/MEG) signals can provide quick and useful information towards understanding cognition and brain disorders. Volume conduction (VC) is a fundamental issue in FC analysis due to the effects of instantaneous correlations. FC methods based on the imaginary part of the coherence (iCOH) of any two signals are readily robust to VC effects, but neglecting the real part of the coherence leads to negligible FC when the processes are truly connected but with zero or π-phase (modulus 2π) interaction. We ameliorate this issue by proposing a novel method that implements an envelope of the imaginary coherence (EIC) to approximate the coherence estimate of supposedly active underlying sources. We compare EIC with state-of-the-art FC measures that included lagged coherence, iCOH, phase lag index (PLI) and weighted PLI (wPLI), using bivariate autoregressive and stochastic neural mass models. Additionally, we create realistic simulations where three and five regions were mapped on a template cortical surface and synthetic MEG signals were obtained after computing the electromagnetic leadfield. With this simulation and comparison study, we also demonstrate the feasibility of sensor FC analysis using receiver operating curve analysis whilst varying the signal’s noise level. However, these results should be interpreted with caution given the known limitations of the sensor-based FC approach. Overall, we found that EIC and iCOH demonstrate superior results with most accurate FC maps. As they complement each other in different scenarios, that will be important to study normal and diseased brain activity.

[1]  X. Mao,et al.  Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications , 1998 .

[2]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[3]  R. Hari,et al.  Phase locking between human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Localizing sensory and cognitive systems for pre-attentive visual deviance detection: An sLORETA analysis of the data of Kimura et al. (2009) , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  Masa-aki Sato,et al.  MEG source reconstruction based on identification of directed source interactions on whole-brain anatomical networks , 2015, NeuroImage.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Parametric Empirical Bayesian Framework for the EEG/MEG Inverse Problem: Generative Models for Multi-Subject and Multi-Modal Integration , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Enhancement of neural synchrony by time delay. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[8]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[9]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images , 2014, NeuroImage.

[10]  Joerg F. Hipp,et al.  Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG , 2014, NeuroImage.

[12]  J. Palva,et al.  Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges and breakthroughs , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  C. Michel,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. II. Demonstration of Sublobar Accuracy in Patients with Simultaneous Surface and Depth Recordings , 2004, Brain Topography.

[14]  Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen,et al.  A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls , 2016, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[15]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  Influences of skull segmentation inaccuracies on EEG source analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[18]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Mechanisms of Zero-Lag Synchronization in Cortical Motifs , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  J. Shaw Correlation and coherence analysis of the EEG: a selective tutorial review. , 1984, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[22]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[23]  Guido Nolte,et al.  Synchronization of parietal and premotor areas during preparation and execution of praxis hand movements , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  A Simulation Framework for Benchmarking EEG-Based Brain Connectivity Estimation Methodologies , 2016, Brain Topography.

[25]  C. Michel,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. I. Method Descriptions and Simulations , 2004, Brain Topography.

[26]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[28]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  An Algorithmic Introduction to Numerical Simulation of Stochastic Differential Equations , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[29]  Benjamin A. E. Hunt,et al.  Measuring electrophysiological connectivity by power envelope correlation: a technical review on MEG methods , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[31]  Habib Bousleiman,et al.  Reproducibility of Functional Connectivity and Graph Measures Based on the Phase Lag Index (PLI) and Weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI) Derived from High Resolution EEG , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  Timothy D. Verstynen,et al.  Explicating the Face Perception Network with White Matter Connectivity , 2013, PloS one.

[34]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[35]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1971 .

[36]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  White-Matter Connectivity between Face-Responsive Regions in the Human Brain , 2012 .

[37]  Guido Nolte,et al.  Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static transformations in sensor space , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Noise-Induced Behaviors in Neural Mean Field Dynamics , 2011, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[40]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  S. Strogatz From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators , 2000 .

[42]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[44]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[45]  M. Clerc,et al.  Comparison of Boundary Element and Finite Element Approaches to the EEG Forward Problem , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[46]  F. D. Silva,et al.  EEG and MEG: Relevance to Neuroscience , 2013, Neuron.

[47]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[48]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Processing social aspects of human gaze: A combined fMRI-DTI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[49]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[50]  B. Lanfer,et al.  Influence of interior cerebrospinal fluid compartments on EEG source analysis , 2012 .

[51]  G. Sandini,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  M. Berger,et al.  Mapping functional connectivity in patients with brain lesions , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[53]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[54]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Dynamics of large-scale electrophysiological networks: A technical review , 2017, NeuroImage.

[55]  Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal activity. Part 1: exact, zero error localization , 2007, 0710.3341.

[56]  G. R. Barnes,et al.  A Quantitative Assessment of the Sensitivity of Whole-Head MEG to Activity in the Adult Human Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[57]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes , 2015, NeuroImage.

[59]  Rolando J. Biscay,et al.  The Local Linearization Method for Numerical Integration of Random Differential Equations , 2005 .

[60]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses , 2015, NeuroImage.

[61]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[62]  C. Stam,et al.  Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[63]  Arjan Hillebrand,et al.  Disrupted brain network topology in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal magnetoencephalography study. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[64]  C. Stam,et al.  The organization of physiological brain networks , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[65]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem , 2008, NeuroImage.

[66]  Sarah Rothstein,et al.  Numerical Solution Of Sde Through Computer Experiments , 2016 .

[67]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Measuring temporal, spectral and spatial changes in electrophysiological brain network connectivity , 2014, NeuroImage.

[68]  G. Edelman,et al.  Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  L. Shampine,et al.  Solving DDEs in MATLAB , 2001 .

[70]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[71]  Rolando J. Biscay-Lirio,et al.  Assessing interactions in the brain with exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[72]  F. H. Lopes da Silva EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience. , 2013, Neuron.

[73]  Veit Stuphorn,et al.  Chronometry of visual responses in frontal eye field, supplementary eye field, and anterior cingulate cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[74]  KongFatt Wong-Lin,et al.  Dynamic Excitatory and Inhibitory Gain Modulation Can Produce Flexible, Robust and Optimal Decision-making , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[75]  Ben H. Jansen,et al.  Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[76]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[77]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Single-Trial Normalization for Event-Related Spectral Decomposition Reduces Sensitivity to Noisy Trials , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[78]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[79]  Luca Faes,et al.  Critical Comments on EEG Sensor Space Dynamical Connectivity Analysis , 2016, Brain Topography.

[80]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[81]  P. Heywood Trigonometric Series , 1968, Nature.

[82]  M. Hallett,et al.  Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[83]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of resting-state functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease , 2006, NeuroImage.

[84]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[85]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.

[86]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[87]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: A simulation study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[88]  Moritz Dannhauer,et al.  Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[89]  K. Müller,et al.  Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[90]  Frederic Dick,et al.  Developmental Changes in Effective Connectivity in the Emerging Core Face Network , 2010, Cerebral cortex.