Methodological problems when determining verbal protocol accuracy empirically
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Pierre-Jean Marescaux,et al. Acquisition of correlated models and local knowledge in simulated control tasks : some evidence of associations between verbalizable knowledge, performance and the ability to answer static situations , 1991 .
[2] Edward S. Johnson. Validation of Concept-Learning Strategies. , 1978 .
[3] Penelope M. Sanderson. Knowledge acquisition and fault diagnosis: experiments with PLAULT , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[4] Gabriel J. Biehal,et al. The Effects of Concurrent Verbalization on Choice Processing , 1989 .
[5] Eric J. Johnson,et al. The validity of verbal protocols , 1989, Memory & cognition.
[6] Penelope M Sanderson,et al. State-space and verbal protocol methods for studying the human operator in process control. , 1989, Ergonomics.
[7] D. Broadbent,et al. On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge , 1984 .
[8] Penelope M. Sanderson,et al. SHAPA: an interactive software environment for protocol analysis , 1989 .
[9] Peter A. White,et al. Knowing more about what we can tell: ‘Introspective access' and causal report accuracy 10 years later , 1988 .
[10] Gerhard Deffner. Interaktion zwischen Lautem Denken, Bearbeitungsstrategien und Aufgabenmerkmalen? Eine experimentelle Prüfung des Modells von Ericsson und Simon. , 1989 .
[11] Gerhard P. Deffner,et al. Evaluation of Concurrent Thinking Aloud Using Eye-tracking Data , 1990 .
[12] J. Rasmussen,et al. Mental procedures in real-life tasks: a case study of electronic trouble shooting. , 1974, Ergonomics.
[13] Penelope M. Sanderson,et al. Verbalizable knowledge and skilled task performance: Association, dissociation, and mental models. , 1989 .