Methodological problems when determining verbal protocol accuracy empirically

The approach normally followed to provide an empirical assessment of verbal protocol accuracy is evaluated from a methodological point of view . Three classes of problems are identified with this approach . These pertain to : selecting and eliciting recordable behaviors, converting the observations into data and interpreting the data . Possible ways to deal with the listed problems are presented . It is emphasized that, when adopting the approach, verbal protocol accuracy can only be inferred rather than directly observed . 'Bxtended version of a paper presented at the Second Workshop of Cognitive Processes in Complex Tasks, Eindhoven, 'the Netherlands, 23-25 April 1991 . Portions of this paper were first published in the author's Ph .D. thesis "The analysis of fault diagnosis tasks: Do verbal reports speak for themselves?" (1990) . 1

[1]  Pierre-Jean Marescaux,et al.  Acquisition of correlated models and local knowledge in simulated control tasks : some evidence of associations between verbalizable knowledge, performance and the ability to answer static situations , 1991 .

[2]  Edward S. Johnson Validation of Concept-Learning Strategies. , 1978 .

[3]  Penelope M. Sanderson Knowledge acquisition and fault diagnosis: experiments with PLAULT , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Gabriel J. Biehal,et al.  The Effects of Concurrent Verbalization on Choice Processing , 1989 .

[5]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The validity of verbal protocols , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Penelope M Sanderson,et al.  State-space and verbal protocol methods for studying the human operator in process control. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[7]  D. Broadbent,et al.  On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge , 1984 .

[8]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  SHAPA: an interactive software environment for protocol analysis , 1989 .

[9]  Peter A. White,et al.  Knowing more about what we can tell: ‘Introspective access' and causal report accuracy 10 years later , 1988 .

[10]  Gerhard Deffner Interaktion zwischen Lautem Denken, Bearbeitungsstrategien und Aufgabenmerkmalen? Eine experimentelle Prüfung des Modells von Ericsson und Simon. , 1989 .

[11]  Gerhard P. Deffner,et al.  Evaluation of Concurrent Thinking Aloud Using Eye-tracking Data , 1990 .

[12]  J. Rasmussen,et al.  Mental procedures in real-life tasks: a case study of electronic trouble shooting. , 1974, Ergonomics.

[13]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Verbalizable knowledge and skilled task performance: Association, dissociation, and mental models. , 1989 .