Effects of training and representational characteristics in icon design

Icons are a very important component of graphical user interfaces. However, icon design is still predominantly artistic in nature and as a result icon selection is generally based on usability evaluations after a set of alternative icons are developed. This process tends to be time-consuming and costly. In this research, we address the issues ofwhat should be depicted in an icon, given the function it should represent, and how training affects the performance of novice users when using an iconic interface. A set of 36 concrete icons (12 functions) were selected and tested with a total of 30 participants. The experimental results indicate that complete representations are generally superior for both untrained and trained participants. Results also show that trained participants had shorter response times when compared to untrained participants. Further analysis suggests that ambiguity, uniqueness and dominance are three important aspects to consider when designing and developing icons. Applications of this research include the design of appropriate icons for graphical user interfaces prior to usability testing and the importance of a short training period to illustrate the composition of an icon in an effort to improve the mental model associated with each design.

[1]  Jane M. Carey,et al.  Assessing the usability of icons in user interfaces , 1991 .

[2]  John C. Thomas,et al.  Metaphor and the Cognitive Representation of Computing Systems , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  Mark Lansdale,et al.  A comparison of words and icons as external memory aids in an information retrieval task , 1990 .

[4]  C. Hartshorne,et al.  Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce , 1935, Nature.

[5]  Beverly G. Knapp,et al.  The Precedence of Global Features in the Perception of Map Symbols , 1985 .

[6]  A. Kox,et al.  THE COLLECTED PAPERS OF , 1996 .

[7]  Kevin Mullet,et al.  Designing Visual Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques , 1994 .

[8]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  Information Design , 2000 .

[9]  D. Norman The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[10]  C. Egido,et al.  Pictures and category labels as navigational aids for catalog browsing , 1988, CHI '88.

[11]  David Gittins,et al.  Icon-Based Human-Computer Interaction , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  Apple Press Newton 2.0 user interface guidelines , 1996 .

[13]  Kenneth N. Lodding,et al.  Iconic Interfacing , 1983, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Icons at the Interface: Their Usefulness , 1989, Interact. Comput..

[15]  H. J. G. Zwaga,et al.  Information design : the design and evaluation of signs and printed material , 1984 .

[16]  Ralph Kimball,et al.  Designing the Star user interface (1982) , 1989 .

[17]  Chaya Garg,et al.  The cross-cultural user interface initiative at Honeywell , 1999, IWIPS.

[18]  Stephen A. R. Scrivener,et al.  Meaning, The Central Issue in Cross-Cultural HCI Design , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[19]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[20]  A. Paivio Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[21]  Benjamin L. Somberg,et al.  A comparison of rule-based and positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items , 1986, CHI '87.

[22]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques , 1996 .

[23]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  From Icons to Interface Models: Designing Hypermedia from the Bottom Up , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  Kathleen Hemenway Psychological issues in the use of icons in command menus , 1982, CHI '82.

[25]  Kai A. Olsen,et al.  Icons in man-machine communications , 1985 .

[26]  Tony Fernandes,et al.  Global interface design , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[27]  Mihai Nadin Interface design and evaluation—Semiotic implications , 1988 .

[28]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Design of Icons for Use by Chinese in Mainland China , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[29]  Sven Blankenberger,et al.  Effects of Icon Design on Human-Computer Interaction , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..