Student Participation, Interaction, and Regulation in a Computer-Mediated Communication Environment: A Qualitative Study

This case study provides a description of student interaction and participation within a computer-mediated environment in an experimental offering of a plant science lab course. Based on structured classroom observation, interviews, and surveys with students and teachers this study examines 1) how a CMC pattern of discourse differs from a face-to-face pattern of discussion in a class setting; 2) whether students participating in a CMC activity produce a discourse that reflects the level of thinking and sharing of ideas desired by the instructor; and 3) how the computer-based interface facilitates and/or inhibits communication between students. This study shows that the CMC-based activities offers an alternative pattern of interaction which differs from the face-to-face pattern in some, but not all ways. The CMC discourse encourages experimentation, sharing of early ideas, increased and more distributed participation, and collaborative thinking. However, for some students the CMC activities are confusing and inhibiting because of the lack of social cues and multiple threads of simultaneous topics—the same features that appeal to other students. Successful use of CMC activities requires a classroom social environment that encourages peer interaction. Equally important is the selection of engaging tasks that are structured enough to diminish confusion but still allow spontaneity and experimentation. Teachers also need to find ways to directly link the CMC discussions to prior and upcoming learning activities so that students will see the value in creating a discourse that they will want to refer to and use in other class activities.

[1]  Beverly Hunter,et al.  Internetworking: coordinating technology for systemic reform , 1993, CACM.

[2]  Donald L. Rubin,et al.  The Social Construction of Written Communication , 1988 .

[3]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  M. Lea,et al.  Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computer-mediated communication. , 1991 .

[5]  Ned A. Flanders,et al.  Analyzing Teaching Behavior , 1970 .

[6]  Larry Press,et al.  Technetronic education: answers on the cultural horizon , 1993, CACM.

[7]  James V. Wertsch,et al.  Culture, communication, and cognition : Vygotskian perspectives , 1987 .

[8]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Electronic Message Systems in the University: A Description of Use and Utility , 1983 .

[9]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[10]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Patterns of Social Interaction and Learning to Write , 1991 .

[11]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Mental models: A research focus for interactive learning systems , 1992 .

[12]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[13]  L. Faigley Fragments of Rationality: Postmodernity and the Subject of Composition , 1992 .

[14]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Technologies for knowledge-building discourse , 1993, CACM.

[15]  Herbert W. Schneider,et al.  Intelligence and Morals , 1926 .

[16]  Jerome Bump,et al.  Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers , 1990, Comput. Humanit..

[17]  Denis Newman School networks: delivery or access , 1993, CACM.

[18]  David Myers “Anonymity is part of the magic”: Individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication contexts , 1987 .

[19]  Frederick B. Tuttle How to prepare students for writing tests , 1986 .

[20]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[21]  H. Mehan Structuring School Structure , 1978 .

[22]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. , 1987 .

[23]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Encountering an Alien Culture , 1984 .

[24]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry , 1988, TOIS.