Evaluating the Benefit of Hearing Aids in Solving the Cocktail Party Problem

The benefit of wearing hearing aids in multitalker, reverberant listening environments was evaluated in a study of speech-on-speech masking with two groups of listeners with hearing loss (younger/older). Listeners selectively attended a known spatial location in two room conditions (low/high reverberation) and identified target speech in the presence of two competing talkers that were either colocated or symmetrically spatially separated from the target. The amount of spatial release from masking (SRM) with bilateral aids was similar to that when listening unaided at or near an equivalent sensation level and was negatively correlated with the amount of hearing loss. When using a single aid, SRM was reduced and was related to the level of the stimulus in the unaided ear. Increased reverberation also reduced SRM in all listening conditions. Results suggest a complex interaction between hearing loss, hearing aid use, reverberation, and performance in auditory selective attention tasks.

[1]  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  The perceptual consequences of binaural hearing , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[2]  R R Coles,et al.  Binaural advantages in hearing of speech , 1971, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[3]  W. Hartmann,et al.  The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification , 2005 .

[4]  C. Darwin.  Auditory grouping , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Masanao Ebata,et al.  Spatial unmasking and attention related to the cocktail party problem , 2003 .

[8]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Judith Harkins,et al.  An Internet Survey of Individuals With Hearing Loss Regarding Assistive Listening Devices , 2007, Trends in amplification.

[10]  J. Pickett,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[14]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing Impaired Listeners: 1st Interna- tional Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research , 2008 .

[15]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Effect of the orientation of the speaker's head and azimuth of a noise source on the speech reception threshold for sentences , 1980 .

[16]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Spatial Benefit of Bilateral Hearing Aids , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[19]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[20]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking , 2005 .

[21]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  R A Bentler,et al.  Effects of release time and directionality on unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fittings in complex sound fields. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[23]  W. Noble,et al.  Optimizing Sound Localization with Hearing Aids , 1998, Trends in amplification.

[24]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[25]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[26]  D. Byrne,et al.  Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing aid types on the ability to locate sounds. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[27]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[28]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[29]  P J Abbas,et al.  Effects of interaural speech-recognition differences on binaural advantage for speech in noise. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[30]  T. Neher,et al.  Spatial unmasking in aided hearing-impaired listeners and the need for training , 2007 .

[31]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: without is better than with. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  C. J. Darwin,et al.  Chapter 11 – Auditory Grouping , 1995 .

[33]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[34]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Spatial Hearing and Perceiving Sources , 2008 .

[36]  Brian E Walden,et al.  Unilateral versus bilateral amplification for adults with impaired hearing. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[37]  J M Festen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ) , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[39]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  The advantage of knowing where to listen. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.