Steel beam–column connection using copper-based shape memory alloy dampers

Abstract This study presents the details of an experimental investigation on a prototype partially restrained connection using copper-based shape memory alloy (SMA) bars. The proposed configuration consists of an end-plate connection between a rectangular hollow structural steel beam and a wide flange steel column, where four CuAlBe ( ϕ = 3 mm ) bars, in austenitic phase, are used to prestress the end-plate to the column flange. A physical model of the connection was tested by applying a controlled cyclic displacement history at the tip of the beam with two different characteristic frequencies of 0.25 and 1 Hz. Potentiometers and load cells were used to measure strains and stresses in the bars and the displacement and load applied at the beam tip. Similar bars, with the same thermal treatment, had been previously tested in cyclic tension at several nominal strains and frequencies, showing superelastic behavior for deformations up to 2.3% strain. In static tensile tests, the fracture strain was approximately 8%, with a transgranular fracture mechanism. The equivalent damping ratio for the single bar test increases for larger strains, being 6% for a 2.3% strain. The beam–column connection also exhibited superelastic behavior, a moderate level of energy dissipation, and no strength degradation after being subjected to several cycles up to 3% drift. Finally, a set of numerical simulations are conducted to compare the performance of a rigid steel frame and a partially restrained frame with SMA connections using a three-story benchmark structure.

[1]  DONATELLO GARDONE,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF R/C FRAMES RETROFITTED WITH DISSIPATING AND RE-CENTRING BRACES , 2004 .

[2]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS IN SEISMIC RESISTANT DESIGN AND RETROFIT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THEIR POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS , 2004 .

[3]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .

[4]  C. Valente,et al.  Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems , 2005 .

[5]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[6]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures , 2006 .

[7]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2001 .

[8]  T. Pence,et al.  Shape memory alloys: modeling , 2002 .

[9]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Review of selected recent research on US seismic design and retrofit strategies for steel structures , 2005 .

[10]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications 1. Martensite and austenite NiTi bars subjected to torsion , 2001 .

[11]  Antonio Isalgue,et al.  From experimental data to quake damping by SMA: a critical experimental analysis and simulation , 2005 .

[12]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Shape Memory Alloys for Seismic Response Modification: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2005 .

[13]  L. Faravelli,et al.  Experimental characterisation of a Cu-based shape memory alloy toward its exploitation in passive control devices , 2004 .

[14]  M. J. Nigel Priestley,et al.  Overview of PRESSS Research Program , 1991 .

[15]  G. Guénin,et al.  The training and re-training procedures for the two way memory effect and its degradation in a CuAlBe alloy , 1996 .

[16]  M. Dolce,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications 2. Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension , 2001 .