Stationary space-time Gaussian fields and their time autoregressive representation

We compare two different modelling strategies for continuous space discrete time data. The first strategy is in the spirit of Gaussian kriging. The model is a general stationary space-time Gaussian field where the key point is the choice of a parametric form for the covariance function. In the main, covariance functions that are used are separable in space and time. Nonseparable covariance functions are useful in many applications, but construction of these is not easy. The second strategy is to model the time evolution of the process more directly. We consider models of the autoregressive type where the process at time t is obtained by convolving the process at time t − 1 and adding spatially correlated noise. Under specific conditions, the two strategies describe two different formulations of the same stochastic process. We show how the two representations look in different cases. Furthermore, by transforming time-dynamic convolution models to Gaussian fields we can obtain new covariance functions and by writing a Gaussian field as a time-dynamic convolution model, interesting properties are discovered. The computational aspects of the two strategies are discussed through experiments on a dataset of daily UK temperatures. Although algorithms for performing estimation, simulation, and so on are easy to do for the first strategy, more computer-efficient algorithms based on the second strategy can be constructed.

[1]  P. Brown,et al.  Blur‐generated non‐separable space–time models , 2000 .

[2]  N. Cressie,et al.  A dimension-reduced approach to space-time Kalman filtering , 1999 .

[3]  N. Cressie,et al.  Classes of nonseparable, spatio-temporal stationary covariance functions , 1999 .

[4]  David Higdon,et al.  Non-Stationary Spatial Modeling , 2022, 2212.08043.

[5]  L Knorr-Held,et al.  Modelling risk from a disease in time and space. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Bayesian Variogram Modeling for an Isotropic Spatial Process , 1997 .

[7]  Michael L. Stein,et al.  Ozone Exposure and Population Density in Harris County, Texas: Comment , 1997 .

[8]  Rong Chen,et al.  Ozone Exposure and Population Density in Harris County, Texas , 1997 .

[9]  Timothy G. Gregoire,et al.  Modelling Longitudinal and Spatially Correlated Data , 1997 .

[10]  Michael A. West,et al.  Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (2nd edn) , 1997, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Richard H. Jones,et al.  Models for Continuous Stationary Space-Time Processes , 1997 .

[12]  Knut Sølna,et al.  Time Trend Estimation for a Geographic Region , 1996 .

[13]  T. C. Haas,et al.  Local Prediction of a Spatio-Temporal Process with an Application to Wet Sulfate Deposition , 1995 .

[14]  Henning Omre,et al.  Spatial Interpolation Errors for Monitoring Data , 1995 .

[15]  N. Shephard,et al.  The simulation smoother for time series models , 1995 .

[16]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[17]  P. Guttorp,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of Nonstationary Spatial Covariance Structure , 1992 .

[18]  A. Yaglom Correlation Theory of Stationary and Related Random Functions I: Basic Results , 1987 .

[19]  A. V. Vecchia A general class of models for stationary two-dimensional random processes , 1985 .

[20]  M. K Kerimov Fourier transforms of distributions and their inverses. Tables: F. Oberhettinger. 248pp. “Nauka”, Moscow, 1979☆ , 1980 .