Swept-Leading-Edge Pylon Effects on a Scramjet Pylon-Cavity Flameholder Flowfield

This study explores the effect of adding a pylon to the leading edge of a cavity flameholder in a scramjet combustor. Data were obtained through a combination of wind-tunnel experimentation and steady-state computational fluid dynamics. Wind-tunnel data were collected using surface pressure taps, static and total probe data, shadowgraph flow visualization, and particle image velocimetry. Computational fluid dynamics models were solved using the commercial FLUENT software. The addition of an intrusive device to the otherwise low-drag cavity flamebolder offers a potential means of improving combustor performance by enabling combustion products to propagate into the main combustor flow via the low-pressure region behind the pylon. This study characterized the flowfield effects of adding the pylon as well as the effect of changing Reynolds numbers over the range of approximately 33 x 10 6 to 55 × 10 6 m ―1 at a Mach number of 2. The addition of the pylon resulted in approximately 3 times the mass flow passing through the cavity compared with the cavity with no pylon installed. Reynolds number effects were weak. The addition of the pylon led to the cavity fluid traveling up to the top of the pylon wake and significantly increasing the exposure and exchange of cavity fluid with the main combustor flow.

[1]  M. Alkislar,et al.  Supersonic Cavity Flows and Their Control , 2006 .

[2]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow , 2004 .

[3]  Computational Study of a Supersonic Mixer-Ejector Exhaust System , 1992 .

[4]  M. Reeder,et al.  Clean Seeding Material for Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements , 2006 .

[5]  J. Rossiter.  Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds , 1964 .

[6]  David W. Riggins,et al.  Vortex generation and mixing in three-dimensional supersonic combustors , 1993 .

[7]  John M. Seiner,et al.  Historical Survey on Enhanced Mixing in Scramjet Engines , 2001 .

[8]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective , 1982 .

[9]  Mark R. Gruber,et al.  Experimental Study of Cavity-Strut Combustion in Supersonic Flow (Postprint) , 2007 .

[10]  Takakage Arai,et al.  Supersonic Streamwise Vortices Breakdown in Scramjet Combustor , 2006 .

[11]  Atul Mathur,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of hydrogen and ethylene combustion in a Mach 3-5 channel with a single injector , 1996 .

[12]  Peter J. Disimile,et al.  Algebraic turbulence model simulations of supersonic open-cavity flow physics , 1996 .

[13]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[14]  A. Thakur,et al.  Concentration Distribution in a Supersonic Flow Recirculation Region , 2008 .

[15]  R. S. Gabruk,et al.  Velocity characteristics of reacting and nonreacting flows in a dump combustor , 1994 .

[16]  M. Reeder,et al.  Characterizing Dry Ice Particle Response for Clean Seeding PIV Applications , 2008 .

[17]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Experimental Studies of Pylon-Aided Fuel Injection into a Supersonic Crossflow , 2008 .

[18]  Charles M. McNiel.  Demonstration of Clean Particle Seeding for Particle Image Velocimetry in a Closed Circuit Supersonic Wind Tunnel , 2007 .

[19]  Viacheslav A. Vinogradov,et al.  Experimental Research of Pre-Injected Methane Combustion in High-Speed Subsonic Airflow , 2003 .

[20]  J. P. Holman,et al.  Experimental methods for engineers , 1971 .

[21]  Chang-Kee Kim,et al.  Cavity Flows in a Scramjet Engine by the Space-Time Conservation and Solution Element Method , 2004 .

[22]  Corin Segal,et al.  Flame-Holding Configurations for Kerosene Combustion in a Mach 1.8 Airflow , 1998 .

[24]  David W. Bogdanoff,et al.  Advanced Injection and Mixing Techniques for Scramjet Combustors , 1994 .

[25]  Tarun Mathur,et al.  Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors , 2001 .

[26]  M. Gruber,et al.  A study of recessed cavity flowfields for supersonic combustion applications , 1998 .

[27]  Gary S. Settles,et al.  A Reattaching Free Shear Layer in Compressible Turbulent Flow: A Comparison of Numerical and Experimental Results , 1981 .

[28]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Experimental Study of Cavity-Strut Combustion in Supersonic Flow , 2007 .

[29]  David W. Riggins,et al.  Mixing and mixing enhancement in supersonic reacting flowfields , 1991 .

[30]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Cavity Flame-Holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: An Overview , 2001 .

[31]  R. Palin,et al.  All Fired Up , 1998 .

[32]  William H. Heiser,et al.  Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion , 1994 .

[33]  Frank P. Houwing,et al.  Cavity Flame-Holder Experiments in a Model Scramjet Engine , 2006 .

[34]  Kenneth J. Wilson,et al.  Effect of Flame-Holding Cavities on Supersonic-Combustion Performance , 2001 .

[35]  Franz Mayinger,et al.  Fuel Injection into a Supersonic Airflow by Means of Pylons , 2000 .

[36]  Andrew B. Freeborn,et al.  Pylon effects on a scramjet cavity flameholder flowfield , 2008 .

[37]  Vyacheslav A. Vinogradov,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Kerosene Fuel Combustion in Supersonic Flow , 1995 .

[38]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Characteristics of Cavity-Stabilized Flames in a Supersonic Flow , 2005 .

[39]  Joseph A. Schetz,et al.  Comparison of Physical and Aerodynamic Ramps as Fuel Injectors in Supersonic Flow , 1998 .

[40]  Douglas L. Davis.  Numerical Analysis of Two and Three Dimensional Recessed Flame Holders for Scramjet Applications , 1996 .

[41]  M. Reeder,et al.  Clean Seeding for Particle Image Velocimetry , 2007, 2007 22nd International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities.

[42]  Corin Segal,et al.  A Review of Fuel Pre-injection in Supersonic, Chemically Reacting Flows , 2007 .

[43]  Donald P. Rizzetta,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Flow Over a Three-Dimensional Cavity , 1987 .