Optimizing the Energy O ff set between Dye and Hole-Transporting Material in Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

The power-conversion efficiency of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells can be optimized by reducing the energy offset between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) levels of dye and hole-transporting material (HTM) to minimize the loss-in-potential. Here, we report a study of three novel HTMs with HOMO levels slightly above and below the one of the commonly used HTM 2,2′,7,7′tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamino)-9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD) to systematically explore this possibility. Using transient absorption spectroscopy and employing the ruthenium based dye Z907 as sensitizer, it is shown that, despite one new HTM showing a 100% hole-transfer yield, all devices based on the new HTMs performed worse than those incorporating spiro-OMeTAD. We further demonstrate that the design of the HTM has an additional impact on the electronic density of states present at the TiO2 electrode surface and hence influences not only holebut also electron-transfer from the sensitizer. These results provide insight into the complex influence of the HTM on charge transfer and provide guidance for the molecular design of new materials.

[1]  M. Johnston,et al.  The origin of an efficiency improving “light soaking” effect in SnO2 based solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells , 2012 .

[2]  Emilio Palomares,et al.  Charge separation versus recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells: the minimization of kinetic redundancy. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Jenny Nelson,et al.  Nondispersive hole transport in amorphous films of methoxy-spirofluorene-arylamine organic compound , 2003 .

[4]  Claudia Barolo,et al.  Design, synthesis, and application of amphiphilic ruthenium polypyridyl photosensitizers in solar cells based on nanocrystalline TiO2 films , 2002 .

[5]  Henry J. Snaith,et al.  Estimating the Maximum Attainable Efficiency in Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells , 2010 .

[6]  Ralph N. Adams,et al.  Anodic Oxidation Pathways of Aromatic Amines. Electrochemical and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Studies , 1966 .

[7]  J. Durrant,et al.  Parameters Influencing Charge Separation in Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells Using Novel Hole Conductors , 2006 .

[8]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  Enhanced charge mobility in a molecular hole transporter via addition of redox inactive ionic dopant: Implication to dye-sensitized solar cells , 2006 .

[9]  F. Fabregat‐Santiago,et al.  Determination of electron and hole energy levels in mesoporous nanocrystalline TiO2 solid-state dye solar cell , 2006 .

[10]  A. Zaban,et al.  Relative Energetics at the Semiconductor/Sensitizing Dye/Electrolyte Interface , 1998 .

[11]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  The Effect of Hole Transport Material Pore Filling on Photovoltaic Performance in Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells , 2011 .

[12]  Frank Lenzmann,et al.  Charge Transport and Recombination in a Nanoscale Interpenetrating Network of n-Type and p-Type Semiconductors: Transient Photocurrent and Photovoltage Studies of TiO2/Dye/CuSCN Photovoltaic Cells , 2004 .

[13]  D. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Effect of surface chelation on the energy of an intraband surface state of a nanocrystalline titania film , 1993 .

[14]  Marco Piccirelli,et al.  High efficiency solid-state photovoltaic device due to inhibition of interface charge recombination , 2001 .

[15]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  Efficiency improvement in solid-state-dye-sensitized photovoltaics with an amphiphilic Ruthenium-dye , 2005 .

[16]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  Porphyrin-Sensitized Solar Cells with Cobalt (II/III)–Based Redox Electrolyte Exceed 12 Percent Efficiency , 2011, Science.

[17]  M. Johnston,et al.  Ultrafast terahertz conductivity dynamics in mesoporous TiO2: Influence of dye sensitization and surface treatment in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells , 2010 .

[18]  N. Robertson,et al.  Diacetylene bridged triphenylamines as hole transport materials for solid state dye sensitized solar cells , 2013 .

[19]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  Pore‐Filling of Spiro‐OMeTAD in Solid‐State Dye Sensitized Solar Cells: Quantification, Mechanism, and Consequences for Device Performance , 2009 .

[20]  Shubhashish Datta,et al.  Relationship between the ionization and oxidation potentials of molecular organic semiconductors , 2005 .

[21]  Claudia Barolo,et al.  Stepwise Assembly of Amphiphilic Ruthenium Sensitizers and their Applications in Dye Sensitized Solar Cell , 2004 .

[22]  R. Silbey,et al.  Chain-length dependence of electronic and electrochemical properties of conjugated systems: polyacetylene, polyphenylene, polythiophene, and polypyrrole , 1983 .

[23]  Saif A. Haque,et al.  Interface Engineering for Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Nanocrystalline Solar Cells: The Use of Ion‐Solvating Hole‐Transporting Polymers , 2004 .

[24]  M. Grätzel,et al.  A Thiophene‐Based Anchoring Ligand and Its Heteroleptic Ru(II)‐Complex for Efficient Thin‐Film Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells , 2011 .

[25]  S. Zakeeruddin,et al.  The influence of dye structure on charge recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[26]  Anders Hagfeldt,et al.  Dye regeneration by spiro-MeOTAD in solid state dye-sensitized solar cells studied by photoinduced absorption spectroscopy and spectroelectrochemistry. , 2009 .

[27]  U. Wiesner,et al.  Control of Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cell Performance by Block‐Copolymer‐Directed TiO2 Synthesis , 2010 .

[28]  C. Yi,et al.  Tris ( 2-( 1 H-pyrazol-1-yl ) pyridine ) cobalt ( III ) as p-Type Dopant for Organic Semiconductors and Its Application in Highly Efficient Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells , 2011 .

[29]  M. Grätzel,et al.  TiO 2 pore-filling and its effect on the efficiency of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells , 2013 .

[30]  M. Grätzel,et al.  A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films , 1991, Nature.

[31]  Priti Tiwana,et al.  Electron mobility and injection dynamics in mesoporous ZnO, SnO₂, and TiO₂ films used in dye-sensitized solar cells. , 2011, ACS nano.

[32]  N. Chen,et al.  Solid state dye sensitized solar cells. , 2013 .

[33]  Henry J. Snaith,et al.  The renaissance of dye-sensitized solar cells , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[34]  S. Haque,et al.  Transient optical studies of interfacial energetic disorder at nanostructured dye-sensitised inorganic/organic semiconductor heterojunctions. , 2003, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[35]  Henry J. Snaith,et al.  Advances in Liquid‐Electrolyte and Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells , 2007 .

[36]  Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin,et al.  Conversion of light to electricity by cis-X2bis(2,2'-bipyridyl-4,4'-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) charge-transfer sensitizers (X = Cl-, Br-, I-, CN-, and SCN-) on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide electrodes , 1993 .

[37]  M. Paoli,et al.  Polymers in dye sensitized solar cells: overview and perspectives , 2004 .

[38]  U. Bach,et al.  Charge Separation in Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Heterojunction Solar Cells , 1999 .

[39]  M. Grätzel,et al.  Electronic and Optical Properties of the Spiro-MeOTAD Hole Conductor in Its Neutral and Oxidized Forms: A DFT/TDDFT Investigation , 2011 .

[40]  G. Boschloo,et al.  Photoinduced absorption spectroscopy of dye-sensitized nanostructured TiO2 , 2003 .

[41]  H. Snaith,et al.  Pore Filling of Spiro‐OMeTAD in Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells Determined Via Optical Reflectometry , 2012 .