Fractal coordination in adults' attention to hierarchical visual patterns.

A display that contains hierarchically nested levels of order requires the perceiver to selectively attend to one of the levels. We investigate the degree to which such selective attention is sustained by a soft-assembled emergent coordinative process, one that does not require designated executive control. In the case of emergent soft-assembly, performance from one trial to the next should show characteristic interdependence, visible in the fractal structure of reaction time. To test this hypothesis, we asked participants across three experiments to decide whether two displays matched in a certain way (e.g., in a local element). In order to gauge this coordinative process, task constraints were experimentally manipulated (e.g., familiarity, predictability, and task instruction). Obtained reaction-time data were subjected to a spectral analysis to measure the degree of interdependence among trials. As predicted, results show correlated structure across trials, significantly different from what would be predicted by an independent-process view of selective attention. Results also show that the obtained spectral scaling exponents track the degree of coupling in the task as a function of the degree of task constraints. Findings are discussed in terms of the relative organism-environment coupling to sustain an adaptive behavior.

[1]  David L. Gilden,et al.  Global Model Analysis of Cognitive Variability , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[3]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  On strong anticipation , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[4]  Maryanne Martin Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[5]  Michael A. Riley,et al.  Feedback about isometric force production yields more random variations , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  On the fractal properties of natural human standing , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Fred Hasselman,et al.  1/f scaling in movement time changes with practice in precision aiming. , 2009, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[8]  Yuko Munakata,et al.  Developing Cognitive Control , 2012, Current directions in psychological science.

[9]  Fell Gs,et al.  Estimation and interpretation on plasma zinc fractions. , 1976 .

[10]  M. Turvey Action and perception at the level of synergies. , 2007, Human movement science.

[11]  J T Enns,et al.  Age differences in visual search for compound patterns: long- versus short-range grouping. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[12]  Linda B. Smith Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment , 2005 .

[13]  J. Stiles,et al.  Children's analysis of hierarchical patterns: evidence from a similarity judgment task. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Human cognition and a pile of sand: a discussion on serial correlations and self-organized criticality. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[16]  J. Enns,et al.  Developmental changes in selective and integrative visual attention. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  G. V. van Orden,et al.  Self-organization of cognitive performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Dynamical Cognitive Science , 2001 .

[19]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[20]  K. Clayton,et al.  Studies of Mental “Noise” , 1997 .

[21]  D. Gilden Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise. , 2001, Psychological review.

[22]  G. Orden,et al.  LIVING IN THE PINK: INTENTIONALITY, WELLBEING, AND COMPLEXITY , 2011 .

[23]  Damian G. Stephen,et al.  Fractal fluctuations in gaze speed visual search , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Adam W. Kiefer,et al.  Walking changes the dynamics of cognitive estimates of time intervals. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[26]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  The Pervasiveness of 1/f Scaling in Speech Reflects the Metastable Basis of Cognition , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  David L. Gilden,et al.  Fluctuations in the Time Required for Elementary Decisions , 1997 .

[28]  Sebastian Wallot,et al.  Effects of Accuracy Feedback on Fractal Characteristics of Time Estimation , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[29]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The dynamic lift of developmental process. , 2007, Developmental science.

[30]  G. V. van Orden,et al.  Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics. , 2009, Psychological review.

[31]  Joan Stiles,et al.  The effects of stimulus density on children’s analysis of hierarchical patterns , 2001 .

[32]  Paul Eling,et al.  Mental fatigue disturbs local processing more than global processing , 2006, Psychological research.

[33]  J. Holden CHAPTER 6 Gauging the Fractal Dimension of Response Times from Cognitive Tasks , 2004 .

[34]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Emergence of global shape processing continues through adolescence. , 2009, Child development.

[35]  Stephen Lynch,et al.  Dynamical Systems with Applications using MATLAB 2nd Edition , 2014 .

[36]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  The emergent coordination of cognitive function. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Ramon D. Castillo,et al.  The Embodiment of Time Estimation , 2010, COST TD0904 International Workshop.

[38]  R. Kimchi Children's perceptual organisation of hierarchical visual patterns , 1990 .

[39]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Fractal Structure of the Nested Actions of Keeping the Beat , 2013, CogSci.

[40]  A. Treisman Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[41]  J. Baird,et al.  Global precedence in visual pattern recognition , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.