Generation Effects and the Lack Thereof: The Role of Transfer-appropriate Processing

We report two experiments designed to test a multifactor transfer-appropriate processing explanation of generation effects, and the lack thereof, in free recall and cued recall. The basic argument is that the act of generating a target enhances the processing of one or more possible types of information (e.g. target-specific information, cue-target relationships, or target-target relationships) and that subsequent retention tests will reveal an advantage (or disadvantage) of such generation (compared to a “read”; control) to the degree that a test is sensitive to the information on which processing was focused during study. Across the two experiments, manipulations of identical stimulus materials forced subjects to process different types of information in order to generate targets, producing a striking reversal in the relative levels of free recall and cued recall for targets that had been generated vs. read, and lending strong support to the transfer-appropriate processing aspect of the proposed framewo...

[1]  L. Jacoby.  Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading , 1983 .

[2]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Generation Effects With Nonwords: The Role of Test Appropriateness , 1987 .

[3]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The Generation Effect: Support for a Two-Factor Theory , 1988 .

[4]  George R. Marshall,et al.  SINGLE-WORD FREE-ASSOCIATION NORMS FOR 328 RESPONSES FROM THE CONNECTICUT CULTURAL NORMS FOR VERBAL ITEMS IN CATEGORIES , 1970 .

[5]  E. Tulving.  Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words. , 1962, Psychological review.

[6]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[7]  R. Hunt,et al.  Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information. , 1984 .

[8]  Alice Kuhn Schwartz.  An analysis of the recall of sequences of related words , 1973 .

[9]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[10]  I. Begg,et al.  The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive. , 1989 .

[11]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[12]  I. Begg,et al.  Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Daniel J. Burns.  The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories. , 1990 .

[14]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Specific enhancement effects associated with word generation , 1986 .

[15]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Reprocessing as a recognition cue , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[16]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Generation effects in free recall: further support for a three-factor theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Elizabeth L. Glisky,et al.  Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations. , 1985 .

[18]  J M Gardiner,et al.  A generation effect with numbers rather than words , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[19]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Generation effects for context words: Implications for item-specific and multifactor theories , 1990 .

[21]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[22]  I. Begg,et al.  The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. , 1987 .

[23]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[24]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[25]  J. S. Nairne.  The mnemonic value of perceptual identification. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. , 1987 .

[27]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. , 1971 .

[28]  D. G. Payne,et al.  The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory ☆ , 1988 .

[30]  I. Begg.  Similarity and contrast in memory for relations , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[31]  L. A. McElroy,et al.  Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect , 1982 .