Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity.

BACKGROUND currently one of the major challenges facing clinical guidelines is multimorbidity. Current guidelines are not designed to consider the cumulative impact of treatment recommendations on people with several conditions, nor to allow comparison of relative benefits or risks. This is despite the fact that multimorbidity is a common phenomenon. OBJECTIVE to examine the extent to which National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines address patient comorbidity, patient centred care and patient compliance to treatment recommendations. METHODS five NICE clinical guidelines were selected for review (type-2 diabetes mellitus, secondary prevention for people with myocardial infarction, osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression) as these conditions are common causes of comorbidity and the guidelines had all been produced since 2007. Two authors extracted information from each full guideline and noted the extent to which the guidelines accounted for patient comorbidity, patient centred care and patient compliance. The cumulative recommended treatment, follow-up and self-care regime for two hypothetical patients were then created to illustrate the potential cumulative impact of applying single disease recommendations to people with multimorbidity. RESULTS comorbidity and patient adherence were inconsistently accounted for in the guidelines, ranging from extensive discussion to none at all. Patient centred care was discussed in generic terms across the guidelines with limited disease-specific recommendations for clinicians. Explicitly following guideline recommendations for our two hypothetical patients would lead to a considerable treatment burden, even when recommendations were followed for mild to moderate conditions. In addition, the follow-up and self-care regime was complex potentially presenting problems for patient compliance. CONCLUSION clinical guidelines have played an important role in improving healthcare for people with long-term conditions. However, in people with multimorbidity current guideline recommendations rapidly cumulate to drive polypharmacy, without providing guidance on how best to prioritise recommendations for individuals in whom treatment burden will sometimes be overwhelming.

[1]  P. Ravaud,et al.  FROM CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS TO MANDATORY PRACTICE , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[2]  J A Knottnerus,et al.  Problems in determining occurrence rates of multimorbidity. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  B. Starfield,et al.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Most hospitalized older persons do not meet the enrollment criteria for clinical trials in heart failure. , 2003, American heart journal.

[5]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[6]  Martin Fortin,et al.  Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review , 2004, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[7]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[9]  A. Wu,et al.  Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care for Older Patients With Multiple Comorbid Diseases , 2005 .

[10]  A. Wu,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. , 2005, JAMA.

[11]  M. Mcmurdo,et al.  Including older people in clinical research , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Factors That Can Affect the External Validity of Randomised Controlled Trials , 2006, PLoS clinical trials.

[13]  François G Schellevis,et al.  Comorbidity and guidelines: conflicting interests , 2006, The Lancet.

[14]  B. Caldwell,et al.  External validity of randomized controlled trials in COPD. , 2007, Respiratory medicine.

[15]  A. Kiss,et al.  Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. , 2007, JAMA.

[16]  Annemarie A Uijen,et al.  Multimorbidity in primary care: Prevalence and trend over the last 20 years , 2008, The European journal of general practice.

[17]  Mark Haddad Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem: treatment and management. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[18]  Carl May,et al.  We need minimally disruptive medicine , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Do Peterson,et al.  Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Mm Jones Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care , 2010 .

[21]  Chris Dyer,et al.  Improving recruitment of older people to research through good practice. , 2011, Age and ageing.

[22]  M. Fortin,et al.  Canadian guidelines for clinical practice: an analysis of their quality and relevance to the care of adults with comorbidity , 2011, BMC family practice.

[23]  J. Valderas,et al.  Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. , 2011, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.