Machine learning based decision support systems (DSS) for heart disease diagnosis: a review

The current review contributes with an extensive overview of decision support systems in diagnosing heart diseases in clinical settings. The investigators independently screened and abstracted studies related to heart diseases-based clinical decision support system (DSS) published until 8-June-2015 in PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. The data extracted from the twenty full-text articles that met the inclusion criteria was classified under the following fields; heart diseases, methods for data sets formation, machine learning algorithms, machine learning-based DSS, comparator types, outcome evaluation and clinical implications of the reported DSS. Out of total of 331 studies 20 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies relate to ischemic heart diseases with neural network being the most common machine learning (ML) technique. Among the ML techniques, ANN classifies myocardial infarction with 97% and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with 87.5% accuracy, CART classifies heart failure with 87.6%, neural network ensembles classifies heart valve with 97.4%, support vector machine classifies arrhythmia screening with 95.6%, logistic regression classifies acute coronary syndrome with 72%, artificial immune recognition system classifies coronary artery disease with 92.5% and genetic algorithms and multi-criteria decision analysis classifies chest-pain patients with 91% accuracy respectively. There were 55% studies that validated the results in clinical settings while 25% validated the results through experimental setups. Rest of the studies (20%) did not report the applicability and feasibility of their methods in clinical settings. The study categorizes the ML techniques according to their performance in diagnosing various heart diseases. It categorizes, compares and evaluates the comparator based on physician’s performance, gold standards, other ML techniques, different models of same ML technique and studies with no comparison. It also investigates the current, future and no clinical implications. In addition, trends of machine learning techniques and algorithms used in the diagnosis of heart diseases along with the identification of research gaps are reported in this study. The reported results suggest reliable interpretations and detailed graphical self-explanatory representations by DSS. The study reveals the need for establishment of non-ambiguous real-time clinical data for proper training of DSS before it can be used in clinical settings. The future research directions of the ML-based DSS is mostly directed towards development of generalized systems that can decide on clinical measurements which are easily accessible and assessable in real-time.

[1]  Vili Podgorelec,et al.  Power of Heterogeneous Computing as a Vehicle for Implementing E$^{\3}$ Medical Decision Support Systems , 1999, MIE.

[2]  Mattias Ohlsson,et al.  Detecting acute myocardial infarction in the 12-lead ECG using Hermite expansions and neural networks , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[3]  Chee Peng Lim,et al.  A Hybrid Neural Network System for Pattern Classification Tasks with Missing Features , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  Using patient-reportable clinical history factors to predict myocardial infarction , 2001, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[5]  Abdulkadir Sengür,et al.  Diagnosis of valvular heart disease through neural networks ensembles , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[6]  T Groth,et al.  Early assessment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction by biochemical monitoring and neural network analysis. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  Emre Çomak,et al.  A Biomedical Decision Support System Using LS-SVM Classifier with an Efficient and New Parameter Regularization Procedure for Diagnosis of Heart Valve Diseases , 2010, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  R. P. Grant Clinical electrocardiography : the spatial vector approach , 1957 .

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[10]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  AHA Statistical Update Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2012 Update A Report From the American Heart Association WRITING GROUP MEMBERS , 2010 .

[11]  Theodore Lim,et al.  Edge-based identification of DP-features on free-form solids , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Yorgos Goletsis,et al.  Automated ischemic beat classification using genetic algorithms and multicriteria decision analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Automated Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease Based on Data Mining and Fuzzy Modeling , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[14]  Mattias Ohlsson,et al.  Evaluation of a decision support system for interpretation of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Syed Umar Amin,et al.  Data Mining in Clinical Decision Support Systems for Diagnosis, Prediction and Treatment of Heart Disease , 2013 .

[16]  N. Weissman,et al.  New imaging techniques for diagnosing coronary artery disease , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[17]  Torgny Groth,et al.  Dynamic decision support graph - Visualization of ANN-generated diagnostic indications of pathological conditions developing over time , 2008, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[18]  V. Seenivasagam,et al.  REVIEW OF HEART DISEASE PREDICTION SYSTEM USING DATA MINING AND HYBRID INTELLIGENT TECHNIQUES , 2013, SOCO 2013.

[19]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery---executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluat , 2002, Circulation.

[20]  Michael Böhm,et al.  Kommentar zu den ESC-Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 , 2008, European journal of heart failure.

[21]  Chandan Chakraborty,et al.  Automated Screening of Arrhythmia Using Wavelet Based Machine Learning Techniques , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[22]  M TAKAYASU [DIAGNOSIS OF HEART VALVE DISEASES]. , 1964, [Sogo rinsho] Clinic all-round.

[23]  Igor Kononenko,et al.  Modern parameterization and explanation techniques in diagnostic decision support system: A case study in diagnostics of coronary artery disease , 2011, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[24]  R. P. Grant,et al.  Grant's clinical electrocardiography : the spatial vector approach , 1970 .

[25]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[26]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. , 2003 .

[27]  Richard Dybowski,et al.  Clinical applications of artificial neural networks: Theory , 2001 .

[28]  Harun Uguz,et al.  A Biomedical System Based on Artificial Neural Network and Principal Component Analysis for Diagnosis of the Heart Valve Diseases , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[29]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  A Machine Learning System to Improve Heart Failure Patient Assistance , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[30]  K. Tägil,et al.  A decision support system improves the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  Ottar Aase,et al.  Clinical Experience with a Decision Support Computer Program Using Bayes’ Theorem to Diagnose Chest Pain Patients , 2000, Cardiology.

[32]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  Mattias Ohlsson,et al.  Risk predictions for individual patients from logistic regression were visualized with bar-line charts. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  M. J. Goldman Principles of Clinical Electrocardiography , 1973 .

[35]  Vili Podgorelec,et al.  Power of heterogeneous computing as a vehicle for implementing E3 medical decision support systems , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[36]  Kemal Polat,et al.  A hybrid approach to medical decision support systems: Combining feature selection, fuzzy weighted pre-processing and AIRS , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[37]  Hadi Kharrazi,et al.  Effects of Data Transformation Methods on Classification of Patients Diagnosed with Myocardial Infarction , 2013, MedInfo.