Control strategy of launch vehicle and lander with adaptive landing gear for sloped landing

Abstract The ability to perform safe landing is of great concern for reusable launch vehicles and landers; however, sloped terrains severely limit the degree of landing safety. To ensure that the launch vehicle and lander land safely, a novel control strategy was built for them. The control strategy depends on the slopes of terrains, which are measured by laser scanning machines. If the measured slope of a terrain is higher than 18% (10°), the lift of vehicle is increased by its engines to allow it to leave the terrain. When the measured slope of a terrain is lower than 18% (10°), the launch vehicle and lander are allowed to land on the terrain. To ensure that the launch vehicle and lander land on a sloped terrain safely, a new adaptive landing gear was designed for them. In the adaptive landing gear, each landing strut contains a shock absorber and an actuating cylinder. The actuating cylinders are controlled to adjust the angles of landing struts to ensure that all landing struts touch down simultaneously. To analyze the landing responses of landing struts, landing dynamic models were established for them. A set of vertical drop tests were used to validate the landing dynamic models. After the validation, dynamic simulations were used to analyze the influence of the adaptive landing gear on the landing responses of landing struts. The landing struts of the adaptive landing gear touched down simultaneously, and their landing responses were compared with traditional landing struts. The comparison verified that the adaptive landing gear decreased the maximum axial force of the most compressed shock absorber. As the maximum axial force of the shock absorber was decreased, its buffer efficiency was increased to 83%. The adaptive landing gear increased the slope limit of terrain when it was equipped on launch vehicles and landers. The launch vehicle with the adaptive landing gear landed on a 55% (29°) sloped terrain safely, and the lander with the adaptive landing gear landed on a 78% (38°) sloped terrain safely.

[1]  Kimberly F. Robinson,et al.  NASA's Space Launch System: Unprecedented Payload Capabilities , 2018 .

[2]  Nam Seo Goo,et al.  Landing Stability Simulation of a 1/6 Lunar Module with Aluminum Honeycomb Dampers , 2013 .

[3]  Martin Sippel,et al.  Analysis of the attempt of launcher stage return by SpaceX’ Falcon 9 , 2015 .

[4]  Mark Costello,et al.  Virtual Model Control of Rotorcraft with Articulated Landing Gear for Shipboard Landing , 2016 .

[5]  Yi-Wei Chang,et al.  The first decade of commercial space tourism , 2015 .

[6]  Zhuang Feng-chen.  Analysis of key technologies and development trend of near space vehicle , 2012 .

[7]  Stephane Heinrich.  GreenSpace and Reuse Scenarios for Launcher industry , 2018 .

[8]  Qilong Zhao,et al.  Impact Analysis of Lunar Lander Soft Landing Performance Caused by the Body Gravity Centerline Shift , 2015 .

[9]  Qun Zong,et al.  Reentry attitude control for a reusable launch vehicle with aeroservoelastic model using type‐2 adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control , 2018 .

[10]  Jo Yung Wong,et al.  Theory of ground vehicles , 1978 .

[11]  Francisco Parres García,et al.  PLD Space’ Arion 2 micro-launcher; simplifying and improving the responsiveness in launch operations. , 2018 .

[12]  Nie Hong,et al.  Overloading of Landing Based on the Deformation of the Lunar Lander , 2008 .

[13]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Design and dynamic analysis of landing gear system in vertical takeoff and vertical landing reusable launch vehicle , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[14]  Leandro dos Santos Coelho,et al.  Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: A novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Qian Wang,et al.  On the effectiveness of assessing model accuracy at design points for radial basis functions , 2006 .

[16]  Stefaan W.R. Duym,et al.  Simulation Tools, Modelling and Identification, for an Automotive Shock Absorber in the Context of Vehicle Dynamics , 2000 .

[17]  Jinbao Chen,et al.  Investigation on landing impact dynamic and low-gravity experiments for deep space lander , 2014 .

[18]  Konstantin A. Karp.  System Analysis of the Advanced Launch Vehicle , 2003 .

[19]  Mark Costello,et al.  Rotorcraft Hard Landing Mitigation Using Robotic Landing Gear , 2016 .

[20]  Łukasz Jankowski,et al.  Adaptive landing gear: Optimum control strategy and potential for improvement , 2009 .

[21]  Robert M. Laurenson,et al.  Analysis of Legged Landers for the Survivable Soft Landing of Instrument Payloads , 1973 .

[22]  Robert E. Lavender.  Monte Carlo approach to touchdown dynamics for soft lunar landings , 1965 .

[23]  Rongqiang Liu,et al.  Touchdown dynamic modeling and simulation of lunar lander , 2010, 2010 3rd International Symposium on Systems and Control in Aeronautics and Astronautics.

[24]  Dennis Stone.  A New Era in Space Flight: The COTS Model of Commercial Partnerships at NASA , 2018 .