Receiving support as a mixed blessing: evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes.

Although social support is thought to boost feelings of closeness in dyadic relationships, recent findings have suggested that support receipt can increase distress in recipients. The authors investigated these apparently contrary findings in a large daily diary study of couples over 31 days leading up to a major stressor. Results confirm that daily support receipt was associated with greater feelings of closeness and greater negative mood. These average effects, however, masked substantial heterogeneity. In particular, those recipients showing greater benefits on closeness tended to show lesser cost on negative mood, and vice versa. Self-esteem was examined as a possible moderator of support effects, but its role was evident in only a subset of recipients. These results imply that models of dyadic support processes must accord a central role to between-individual heterogeneity.

[1]  T. Antonucci,et al.  Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Niall Bolger,et al.  Why Is Enacted Social Support Associated With Increased Distress? Using Simulation to Test Two Possible Sources of Spuriousness , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  Debra Mashek,et al.  Handbook of closeness and intimacy , 2004 .

[4]  M. Whisman,et al.  Correlates of Depression and Marital Dissatisfaction: Perceptions of Marital Communication Style , 2003 .

[5]  K. Roberto,et al.  Equity considerations in the friendships of older adults. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[6]  N. Krause,et al.  Social exchange and well-being: is giving better than receiving? , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[7]  Arie Nadler,et al.  Determinants of help seeking behaviour: The effects of helper's similarity, task centrality and recipient's self esteem , 1987 .

[8]  A. Scoboria,et al.  The relative contribution of trait and social influences to the links among perceived social support, affect, and self-esteem. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[9]  S. Gosling,et al.  The precarious couple effect: verbally inhibited men + critical, disinhibited women = bad chemistry. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  J. Gottman.  Detecting cyclicity in social interaction. , 1979 .

[11]  A. Scoboria,et al.  THE INFORMATION USED TO JUDGE SUPPORTIVENESS DEPENDS ON WHETHER THE JUDGMENT REFLECTS THE PERSONALITY OF PERCEIVERS, THE OBJECTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TARGETS, OR THEIR UNIQUE RELATIONSHIPS , 2004 .

[12]  James A. Bovaird,et al.  Modeling Ecological and Contextual Effects in Longitudinal Studies of Human Development , 2007 .

[13]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Perceived Partner Responsiveness as an Organizing Construct in the Study of Intimacy and Closeness , 2004 .

[14]  Patrick E. Shrout,et al.  Accounting for statistical dependency in longitudinal data on dyads , 2007 .

[15]  C. Cutrona.  Social Support in Couples: Marriage as a Resource in Times of Stress , 1996 .

[16]  Life events, relationship quality, and depression: an investigation of judgment discontinuity in vivo. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Kessler,et al.  Invisible support and adjustment to stress. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  T. Revenson,et al.  Couples Coping With Stress: Emerging Perspectives On Dyadic Coping , 2005 .

[19]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Handbook of social support and the family , 1996 .

[20]  Masumi Iida,et al.  Daily Supportive Equity in Close Relationships , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[21]  G. Spanier.  Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .

[22]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[23]  B. Gottlieb.  Social Networks And Social Support , 1981 .

[24]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  He Said, She Said , 2003, Psychological science.

[25]  Masumi Iida,et al.  A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably? , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[26]  J. Fisher,et al.  With a little help from my friend: Effect of single or multiple act aid as a function of donor and task characteristics. , 1983 .

[27]  E. Borgatta,et al.  Research on Aging , 1979 .

[28]  Neal Krause,et al.  Received Support, Anticipated Support, Social Class, and Mortality , 1997 .

[29]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[31]  B. Israel,et al.  Social networks and social support. , 2008 .

[32]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[33]  Brooke C. Feeney,et al.  A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. , 2000 .

[34]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  Carnegie Mellon , 2003 .

[35]  B. Buunk,et al.  Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[36]  P. Shrout,et al.  The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress , 2006 .

[37]  N. Collins,et al.  Motivations for Caregiving in Adult Intimate Relationships: Influences on Caregiving Behavior and Relationship Functioning , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[38]  J. Nazroo,et al.  Gender differences in marital support following a shared life event. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[39]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  E. Uehara,et al.  Reciprocity Reconsidered: Gouldner's `Moral Norm of Reciprocity' and Social Support , 1995 .

[41]  Gender Differences in Coping: A Comparison of Trait and Momentary Assessments , 2000 .

[42]  H. Reis,et al.  Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. , 1996 .

[43]  B. Lakey,et al.  Social support and preventive and therapeutic interventions. , 1996 .

[44]  I. Sarason,et al.  Social Support: Global and Relationship-Based Levels of Analysis , 1994 .

[45]  S. Streufert,et al.  When helping hurts: effects of donor-recipient similarity and recipient self-esteem on reactions to aid. , 1976, Journal of personality.

[46]  Manuel Barrera,et al.  Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models , 1986 .

[47]  Lisa A. Neff,et al.  The Dynamic Structure of Relationship Perceptions: Differential Importance as a Strategy of Relationship Maintenance , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[48]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  Coefficient Alpha and Composite Reliability With Interrelated Nonhomogeneous Items , 1998 .

[49]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[50]  N. Collins,et al.  Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: an attachment theoretical perspective. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Niall Bolger,et al.  Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: experimental evidence. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  S. Thompson,et al.  Caregiving in the close relationships of cardiac patients: Exchange, power, and attributional perspectives on caregiver resentment , 1995 .

[53]  T. Antonucci,et al.  An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women , 1987 .

[54]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Reciprocity in Interpersonal Relationships: An Evolutionary Perspective on Its Importance for Health and Well-being , 1999 .

[55]  Sheldon Cohen.  Social relationships and health. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[56]  Daniel W. Russell,et al.  The Relationship Enhancement Model of Social Support. , 2005 .

[57]  N. Cantor,et al.  Creating satisfaction in steady dating relationships : The role of personal goals and situational affordances , 1997 .

[58]  A. Bandura.  The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. , 1982, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[59]  Arie Nadler,et al.  Recipient reactions to aid , 1982 .