Gene Dosage and Gene Duplicability

The evolutionary process leading to the fixation of newly duplicated genes is not well understood. It was recently proposed that the fixation of duplicate genes is frequently driven by positive selection for increased gene dosage (i.e., the gene dosage hypothesis), because haploinsufficient genes were reported to have more paralogs than haplosufficient genes in the human genome. However, the previous analysis incorrectly assumed that the presence of dominant abnormal alleles of a human gene means that the gene is haploinsufficient, ignoring the fact that many dominant abnormal alleles arise from gain-of-function mutations. Here we show in both humans and yeast that haploinsufficient genes generally do not duplicate more frequently than haplosufficient genes. Yeast haploinsufficient genes do exhibit enhanced retention after whole-genome duplication compared to haplosufficient genes if they encode members of stable protein complexes, but the same phenomenon is absent if the genes do not encode protein complex members, suggesting that the dosage balance effect rather than the dosage effect is the underlying cause of the phenomenon. On the basis of these and other results, we conclude that selection for higher gene dosage does not play a major role in driving the fixation of duplication genes.

[1]  David Valle,et al.  Human disease genes , 2001, Nature.

[2]  H. Kaji,et al.  Brief report: short stature caused by a mutant growth hormone. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[4]  U. Alon,et al.  Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein , 2005, Nature.

[5]  U. Alon,et al.  Plasticity of the cis-Regulatory Input Function of a Gene , 2006, PLoS biology.

[6]  D. Nicolae,et al.  Rapid divergence in expression between duplicate genes inferred from microarray data. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[7]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[8]  C. Pál,et al.  Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Hideki Innan,et al.  Very Low Gene Duplication Rate in the Yeast Genome , 2004, Science.

[10]  D. Petrov,et al.  Preferential Duplication of Conserved Proteins in Eukaryotic Genomes , 2004, PLoS biology.

[11]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome , 1997, Nature.

[12]  H. Innan,et al.  Selection for more of the same product as a force to enhance concerted evolution of duplicated genes. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[13]  G. Binder,et al.  Mechanisms responsible for dominant expression of human growth hormone gene mutations. , 1996, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[14]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  GenomeHistory: a software tool and its application to fully sequenced genomes. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  Li Li,et al.  Preferential duplication in the sparse part of yeast protein interaction network. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  Natalia Maltsev,et al.  Higher Gene Duplicabilities for Metabolic Proteins Than for Nonmetabolic Proteins in Yeast and E. coli , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  A. Wagner.  The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  Richard W. Lusk,et al.  Organismal complexity, protein complexity, and gene duplicability , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Rapid Subfunctionalization Accompanied by Prolonged and Substantial Neofunctionalization in Duplicate Gene Evolution , 2005, Genetics.

[20]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Protein Under-Wrapping Causes Dosage Sensitivity and Decreases Gene Duplicability , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[21]  Dr. Susumu Ohno.  Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[23]  D. Hoyle,et al.  Identification and characterization of high-flux-control genes of yeast through competition analyses in continuous cultures , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[24]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[25]  A. Force,et al.  The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. , 2000, Genetics.

[26]  R. Veitia,et al.  Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[27]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  A common framework for understanding the origin of genetic dominance and evolutionary fates of gene duplications. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  Doron Lancet,et al.  Alternative splicing and gene duplication are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Higher duplicability of less important genes in yeast genomes. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[30]  Fernando A. Villanea,et al.  Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[31]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Mechanisms of Haploinsufficiency Revealed by Genome-Wide Profiling in Yeast , 2005, Genetics.

[32]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Estimating the Per-Base-Pair Mutation Rate in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[33]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Gene Complexity and Gene Duplicability , 2005, Current Biology.

[34]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Role of selection in fixation of gene duplications. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  Dmitri A Petrov,et al.  Do disparate mechanisms of duplication add similar genes to the genome? , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[36]  Jianzhi Zhang.  Evolution by gene duplication: an update , 2003 .

[37]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Protein function, connectivity, and duplicability in yeast. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.