Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory: Principles, Model Hierarchies, and Deviation Kinetic Energy Extensions

The thermodynamically constrained averaging theory (TCAT) is a comprehensive theory used to formulate hierarchies of multiphase, multiscale models that are closed based upon the second law of thermodynamics. The rate of entropy production is posed in terms of the product of fluxes and forces of dissipative processes. The attractive features of TCAT include consistency across disparate length scales; thermodynamic consistency across scales; the inclusion of interfaces and common curves as well as phases; the development of kinematic equations to provide closure relations for geometric extent measures; and a structured approach to model building. The elements of the TCAT approach are shown; the ways in which each of these attractive features emerge from the TCAT approach are illustrated; and a review of the hierarchies of models that have been formulated is provided. Because the TCAT approach is mathematically involved, we illustrate how this approach can be applied by leveraging existing components of the theory that can be applied to a wide range of applications. This can result in a substantial reduction in formulation effort compared to a complete derivation while yielding identical results. Lastly, we note the previous neglect of the deviation kinetic energy, which is not important in slow porous media flows, formulate the required equations to extend the theory, and comment on applications for which the new components would be especially useful. This work should serve to make TCAT more accessible for applications, thereby enabling higher fidelity models for applications such as turbulent multiphase flows.

[1]  William G. Gray,et al.  Modeling two-fluid-phase flow and species transport in porous media , 2015 .

[2]  Tian-Jian Hsu,et al.  SedFoam: A multi-dimensional Eulerian two-phase model for sediment transport and its application to momentary bed failure , 2017 .

[3]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[4]  S. Whitaker The method of volume averaging , 1998 .

[5]  Yu.L. Klimontovich Is turbulent motion chaos or order? Is the hydrodynamic or the kinetic description of turbulent motion more natural? , 1996 .

[6]  William G. Gray,et al.  On the dynamics and kinematics of two‐fluid‐phase flow in porous media , 2015 .

[7]  A. L. Dye,et al.  On Conservation Equation Combinations and Closure Relations , 2014, Entropy.

[8]  William G. Gray,et al.  Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 9. Transition region models , 2012 .

[9]  William G. Gray,et al.  On the consistency of scale among experiments, theory, and simulation , 2016 .

[10]  Stephen Whitaker,et al.  Mechanics and thermodynamics of diffusion , 2012 .

[11]  Dr. M. G. Worster Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1947, Nature.

[12]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory Approach for Modeling Flow and Transport Phenomena in Porous Medium Systems: 5. Single-Fluid-Phase Transport. , 2009, Advances in water resources.

[13]  W. G. Gray,et al.  Consistent thermodynamic formulations for multiscale hydrologic systems: Fluid pressures , 2007 .

[14]  Peter Davidson,et al.  Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2015 .

[15]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 1. Motivation and overview , 2005 .

[16]  Lukas Schneider,et al.  Solid-Fluid Mixtures of Frictional Materials in Geophysical and Geotechnical Context: Based on a Concise Thermodynamic Analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  A Pedagogical Approach to the Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory , 2017, Transport in Porous Media.

[18]  William G. Gray,et al.  A generalization of averaging theorems for porous medium analysis , 2013 .

[19]  Donald A. Drew,et al.  An assessment of multiphase flow models using the second law of thermodynamics , 1990 .

[20]  William G. Gray,et al.  Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 2. Foundation , 2005 .

[21]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory Approach for Modeling Flow and Transport Phenomena in Porous Medium Systems: 8. Interface and Common Curve Dynamics. , 2010, Advances in water resources.

[22]  M. Hubbert,et al.  DARCY'S LAW AND THE FIELD EQUATIONS OF THE FLOW OF UNDERGROUND FLUIDS , 1956 .

[23]  Stephen Whitaker,et al.  ADVANCES IN THEORY OF FLUID MOTION IN POROUS MEDIA , 1969 .

[24]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  Double-Averaging Concept for Rough-Bed Open-Channel and Overland Flows: Theoretical Background , 2007 .

[25]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Averaging Theory for Description of Environmental Problems: What Have We Learned? , 2013, Advances in water resources.

[26]  Jean-Luc Guermond,et al.  Entropy viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[27]  Miguel A. F. Sanjuán,et al.  Modern classical physics: optics, fluids, plasmas, elasticity, relativity, and statistical physics , 2018, Contemporary Physics.

[28]  Cheryl Ann Blain,et al.  Mathematical Tools for Changing Spatial Scales in the Analysis of Physical Systems , 2020 .

[29]  William G. Gray,et al.  Introduction to the Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory for Porous Medium Systems , 2014 .

[30]  S. Brendle,et al.  Calculus of Variations , 1927, Nature.

[31]  Jean-Luc Guermond,et al.  Entropy-based nonlinear viscosity for Fourier approximations of conservation laws , 2008 .