Guided Search 3.0

Forty years ago, Enoch reported a central bias in eye movements made during visual search tasks. Here we discuss how our Guided Search 3.0 model incorporates that observation into a general account of visual search behavior.

[1]  J M ENOCH,et al.  Effect of the size of a complex display upon visual search. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  J. Findlay.  Visual search: eye movements and peripheral vision. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  John Heil,et al.  Perception and cognition , 1983 .

[6]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  H. Egeth,et al.  Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.