Mapping physician networks with self-reported and administrative data.

OBJECTIVE To assess whether connections between physicians based on shared patients in administrative data correspond with professional relationships between physicians. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING Survey of physicians affiliated with a large academic and community physicians' organization and 2006 Medicare data from a 100 percent sample of patients in the Boston Hospital referral region. STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION We administered a web-based survey to 616 physicians (response rate: 63 percent) about referral and advice relationships with physician colleagues. Relationships measured by this questionnaire were compared with relationships assessed by patient sharing, measured using 2006 Medicare data. Each physician was presented with an individualized roster of physicians' names with whom they did and did not share patients based on the Medicare data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The probability of two physicians having a recognized professional relationship increased with the number of Medicare patients shared, with up to 82 percent of relationships recognized with nine shared patients, overall representing a diagnostic test with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.73 (95 percent CI: 0.70-0.75). Primary care physicians were more likely to recognize relationships than medical or surgical specialists (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS Patient sharing identified using administrative data is an informative "diagnostic test" for predicting the existence of relationships between physicians. This finding validates a method that can be used for future research to map networks of physicians.

[1]  J. Rizzo,et al.  Physician Referrals and the Medical Market Place , 1991, Medical care.

[2]  Marcello Pagano,et al.  Principles of Biostatistics , 1992 .

[3]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Commentary - Contagion in Prescribing Behavior Among Networks of Doctors , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[4]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: Questionnaire design issues , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[5]  R. Newson Confidence Intervals for Rank Statistics: Somers’ D and Extensions , 2006 .

[6]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[7]  B. Starfield,et al.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[8]  J. Gabbay,et al.  Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[10]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  N. Keating,et al.  Factors Affecting Influential Discussions Among Physicians: A Social Network Analysis of a Primary Care Practice , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[12]  Russell S. Kirby,et al.  The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care , 1998 .

[13]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[14]  S. Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs Tomihisa Kamada and Satoru Kawai , 1989 .

[15]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[16]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[17]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Physicians' experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation. , 1998, JAMA.

[18]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[19]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.