Nonlinear Dependence of Hydraulic Conductivity on Tissue Deformation During Intratumoral Infusion

Efficiency of intratumoral infusion for drug and gene delivery depends on intrinsic tissue structures as well as infusion-induced changes in these structures. To this end, we investigated effects of infusion pressure (Pinf) and infusion-induced tissue deformation on infusion rate (Q) in three mouse tumor models (B16.F10, 4T1, and U87) and developed a poroelastic model for interpreting data and understanding mechanisms of fluid transport in tumors. The collagen concentrations in these tumors were 2.9±1.2, 12.2±0.9, and 18.1±3.5 μg/mg wet wt. of tissues, respectively. During the infusion, there existed a threshold infusion pressure (Pt), below which fluid flow could not be initiated. The values of Pt for these tumors were 7.36, 36.8, and 29.4 mmHg, respectively. Q was a bell-shaped function of Pinf in 4T1 tumors but increased monotonically with increasing Pinf in other tumors. These observations were consistent with results from numerical simulations based on the poroelastic model, suggesting that both the existence of Pt and the nonlinear relationships between Q and Pinf could be explained by infusion-induced tissue deformation that anisotropically affected the hydraulic conductivity of tissues. These results may be useful for further investigations of intratumoral infusion of drugs and genes.

[1]  Fung,et al.  Polymeric implants for cancer chemotherapy. , 1997, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[2]  R. Skalak,et al.  Macro- and Microscopic Fluid Transport in Living Tissues: Application to Solid Tumors , 1997 .

[3]  Saroja Ramanujan,et al.  Diffusion and convection in collagen gels: implications for transport in the tumor interstitium. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[4]  F. Yuan,et al.  Transvascular drug delivery in solid tumors. , 1998, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[5]  W M Lai,et al.  Drag-induced compression of articular cartilage during a permeation experiment. , 1980, Biorheology.

[6]  R. Jain,et al.  Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. , 2000, Cancer research.

[7]  E. Oldfield,et al.  Tumor regression with regional distribution of the targeted toxin TF-CRM107 in patients with malignant brain tumors , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Malisa Sarntinoranont,et al.  Direct interstitial infusion of NK1-targeted neurotoxin into the spinal cord: a computational model. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[9]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Interstitial hydraulic conductivity in a fibrosarcoma. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[10]  R K Jain,et al.  Microvascular pressure is the principal driving force for interstitial hypertension in solid tumors: implications for vascular collapse. , 1992, Cancer research.

[11]  R. Jain,et al.  Coupled macromolecular transport and gel mechanics: Poroviscoelastic approach , 2003 .

[12]  G. Truskey,et al.  Transport phenomena in biological systems , 2004 .

[13]  P F Morrison,et al.  Variables affecting convection-enhanced delivery to the striatum: a systematic examination of rate of infusion, cannula size, infusate concentration, and tissue-cannula sealing time. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  Dillehay Le Decreasing resistance during fast infusion of a subcutaneous tumor. , 1997 .

[15]  S McGuire,et al.  Quantitative analysis of intratumoral infusion of color molecules. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[16]  R. K. Jain,et al.  Intratumoral infusion of fluid: estimation of hydraulic conductivity and implications for the delivery of therapeutic agents. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  H. Cheung,et al.  New insight into deformation-dependent hydraulic permeability of gels and cartilage, and dynamic behavior of agarose gels in confined compression. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R K Jain,et al.  Diffusion of macromolecules in agarose gels: comparison of linear and globular configurations. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[19]  G. Aldis,et al.  Comparison of models for flow induced deformation of soft biological tissue. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  F. Yuan,et al.  Characterisation of systemic dissemination of nonreplicating adenoviral vectors from tumours in local gene delivery , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  P F Morrison,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Tarbell,et al.  Modeling water flow through arterial tissue , 1987 .

[23]  F. Yuan,et al.  A novel method for viral gene delivery in solid tumors. , 2005, Cancer research.

[24]  E. Wintour,et al.  Collagen Studies in Late Pregnant Relaxin Null Mice1 , 2000, Biology of reproduction.

[25]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular microenvironment of the rat cerebellum. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  Malisa Sarntinoranont,et al.  Interstitial Stress and Fluid Pressure Within a Growing Tumor , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  David J. Mooney,et al.  DNA delivery from polymer matrices for tissue engineering , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  P. Basser Interstitial pressure, volume, and flow during infusion into brain tissue. , 1992, Microvascular research.

[29]  G. Aldis,et al.  Flow-induced deformation from pressurized cavities in absorbing porous tissues. , 1992, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[30]  K. Parker,et al.  Steady Flow in Porous, Elastically Deformable Materials , 1987 .

[31]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Micropharmacology of monoclonal antibodies in solid tumors: direct experimental evidence for a binding site barrier. , 1992, Cancer research.

[32]  F. Yuan,et al.  Available Space and Extracellular Transport of Macromolecules: Effects of Pore Size and Connectedness , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  T. Yokota,et al.  Construction, binding properties, metabolism, and tumor targeting of a single-chain Fv derived from the pancarcinoma monoclonal antibody CC49. , 1991, Cancer research.

[34]  Hai Yao,et al.  Physical Signals and Solute Transport in Cartilage Under Dynamic Unconfined Compression: Finite Element Analysis , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Timothy W Secomb,et al.  A theoretical model for intraperitoneal delivery of cisplatin and the effect of hyperthermia on drug penetration distance. , 2004, Neoplasia.

[36]  R. Barr,et al.  Electromobility of plasmid DNA in tumor tissues during electric field-mediated gene delivery , 2002, Gene Therapy.

[37]  R. Skalak,et al.  Time-dependent behavior of interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: implications for drug delivery. , 1995, Cancer research.

[38]  T. Secomb,et al.  Effect of cell arrangement and interstitial volume fraction on the diffusivity of monoclonal antibodies in tissue. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[39]  P F Morrison,et al.  High-flow microinfusion: tissue penetration and pharmacodynamics. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[40]  W. Saltzman,et al.  Covalent coupling of methotrexate to dextran enhances the penetration of cytotoxicity into a tissue-like matrix. , 1994, Cancer research.