Numerical Simulations and Empirical Data for the Evaluation of Daylight Factors in Existing Buildings in Sweden

Point Daylight Factor (DFP) has been used for daylighting design in Sweden for more than 40 years. Progressive densification of urban environments, in combination with stricter regulations on energy performance and indoor environmental quality of buildings, creates complex daylight design challenges that cannot be adequately solved with DFP. To support a development of the current and future daylight indicators in the Swedish context, the authors have developed a comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of daylight levels in existing buildings. The methodology comprises sample buildings of various use and their digital replicas in 3D, detailed numerical simulations and correlations of diverse DF metrics in existing buildings, a field investigation on residents’ satisfaction with available daylight levels in their homes, and a comparison between the numerical and experimental data. The study was deliberately limited to the evaluation of DF metrics for their intuitive understanding and easy evaluation in real design projects. The sample buildings represent typical architectural styles and building technologies between 1887 and 2013 in Gothenburg and include eight residential buildings, two office buildings, two schools, two student apartment buildings, and two hospitals. Although the simulated DFP is 1.4% on average, i.e., above the required 1%, large variations have been found between the studied 1200 rooms. The empirical data generally support the findings from the numerical simulations, but also bring unique insights in the residences’ preferences for rooms with good daylight. The most remarkable result is related to kitchens, typically the spaces with the lowest DF values, based on simulations, while the residents wish them to be the spaces with the most daylight. Finally, the work introduces a new DF metric, denoted DFW, which allows daylighting design in early stages when only limited data on the building shape and windows’ arrangement are available.

[1]  F. Nocera,et al.  Daylight Performance of Classrooms in a Mediterranean School Heritage Building , 2018, Sustainability.

[2]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Simulation of annual daylighting profiles for internal illuminance , 2000 .

[3]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Energy usage and technical potential for energy saving measures in the Swedish residential building stock , 2013 .

[4]  Yuehong Su,et al.  Application of RELUX simulation to investigate energy saving potential from daylighting in a new educational building in UK , 2014 .

[5]  Truus Hordijk,et al.  The D&V analysis method: A method for the analysis of daylight access and view quality , 2014 .

[6]  Lovisa Waldenström,et al.  Daylight in Existing Buildings - A Comparative Study of Calculated Indicators for Daylight , 2016 .

[7]  Yuehong Su,et al.  Daylight availability assessment and its potential energy saving estimation –A literature review , 2015 .

[8]  E. J. Eriksson Evaluation of Sun- and Daylight Availability in Early Stages of Building Development , 2017 .

[9]  P. R. Tregenza,et al.  Uncertainty in daylight calculations , 2017 .

[10]  Nathaniel L. Jones Validated interactive daylighting analysis for architectural design , 2017 .

[11]  Ove Mørck,et al.  Energy consumption and indoor climate in a residential building before and after comprehensive energy retrofitting , 2016 .

[12]  Peter Andreas Sattrup,et al.  The urban canyon and building energy use: Urban density versus daylight and passive solar gains , 2011 .

[13]  Dhw Li,et al.  Average daylight factor for the 15 CIE standard skies , 2006 .

[14]  Peng Xue,et al.  The effects of daylighting and human behavior on luminous comfort in residential buildings: A questionnaire survey , 2014 .

[15]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Daylighting Metrics for Residential Buildings , 2011 .

[16]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Daylighting and energy implications due to shading effects from nearby buildings , 2007 .

[17]  Laura Bellia,et al.  The impact of the software’s choice on dynamic daylight simulations’ results: A comparison between Daysim and 3ds Max Design , 2015 .

[18]  H. D. Cheung,et al.  A study on subjective preference to daylit residential indoor environment using conjoint analysis , 2008 .

[19]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Tips for Daylighting with Windows , 2013 .

[20]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  A study of the daylighting performance and energy use in heavily obstructed residential buildings via computer simulation techniques , 2006 .

[21]  A ROADMAP FOR UPGRADING NATIONAL/EU STANDARDS FOR DAYLIGHT IN BUILDINGS , 2013 .

[22]  Kajsa Flodberg,et al.  Daylight utilisation in perimeter office rooms at high latitudes: Investigation by computer simulation , 2013 .

[23]  M-C. Dubois,et al.  Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity , 2011 .

[24]  M. Dubois,et al.  Daylight regulation compliance of existing multi-family apartment blocks in Sweden , 2019, Building and Environment.