Evidence-based data and rare cancers: The need for a new methodological approach in research and investigation.

Rare cancers are not so rare, their incidence is increasing and, as a group, they have worse survival than the common cancers. These factors emphasise the societal need to ensure sufficient focus on research into their biological basis, aetiological factors, new more effective therapies and organisation of healthcare to improve access to best practice and innovation. Accuracy of diagnosis is one of the first hurdles to be overcome, with around one third of tumours being reclassified - by type or risk group - when subject to a centralised pathology review process. Timely access to appropriate expert knowledge is a second challenge for patients - in Europe this is being addressed by the establishment of European Reference Networks (ERNs) as part of the EU cross border healthcare initiative. There are ERNs for adult solid and haematological cancers and childhood cancers, all of which are individually rare. These ERNs will facilitate creation of large databases of rare tumours that will incorporate knowledge of their molecular features and build an evidence base for the effectiveness of innovative, biology-directed therapies. With an increasing focus on 'real world' outcome data, research methodologies are evolving, to include randomised registry trials and data linkage approaches that exploit the ever-richer information held on patients in routine health care data. The inclusion of genomic analysis into cancer diagnosis, treatment and risk prediction raises many issues for the conduct of clinical research and cohort studies and personal data sharing. Sophisticated means of pseudonymisation, together with full involvement of affected and 'at risk' patients, are supporting novel research designs and access to data that will continue to build the evidence base to improve outcomes for patients with rare cancers.

[1]  M. Parmar,et al.  How do you design randomised trials for smaller populations? A framework , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[2]  Eva Steliarova-Foucher,et al.  International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001–10: a population-based registry study , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  T. Trimble,et al.  International rare cancers initiative. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Clinical epidemiology in the era of big data: new opportunities, familiar challenges , 2017, Clinical epidemiology.

[5]  A. Craft,et al.  Evidence for a delay in diagnosis of Wilms’ tumour in the UK compared with Germany: implications for primary care for children , 2016, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[6]  Anne R. Pariser,et al.  Rare Cancer Trial Design: Lessons from FDA Approvals , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  A. Gavin,et al.  Treatment challenges in and outside a network setting: Soft tissue sarcomas. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  M. Coleman,et al.  Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  Maria Grazia Valsecchi,et al.  Improving recruitment to clinical trials for cancer in childhood. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  G. Gatta,et al.  Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[11]  D. Kirsch,et al.  Preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a case-control, propensity score-matched analysis of a nationwide clinical oncology database. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  A. Jemal,et al.  The burden of rare cancers in the United States , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  J. Blay,et al.  Improving treatment results with reference centres for rare cancers: where do we stand? , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[14]  R. Benjamin Observational studies: goldmines of information on rare diseases , 2017, BMC Medicine.

[15]  P. F. Anderson,et al.  Disease-Specific Hashtags for Online Communication About Cancer Care. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[16]  J. Coindre,et al.  Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  J. Blay,et al.  Patterns of care and outcomes of patients with METAstatic soft tissue SARComa in a real-life setting: the METASARC observational study , 2017, BMC Medicine.

[18]  R. Schilsky Finding the Evidence in Real-World Evidence: Moving from Data to Information to Knowledge. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[19]  C. Fisher,et al.  Histopathological Diagnostic Discrepancies in Soft Tissue Tumours Referred to a Specialist Centre: Reassessment in the Era of Ancillary Molecular Diagnosis , 2014, Sarcoma.

[20]  J. Blay,et al.  Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[21]  A. Redig,et al.  Basket trials and the evolution of clinical trial design in an era of genomic medicine. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Eva Ardanaz,et al.  Burden and centralised treatment in Europe of rare tumours: results of RARECAREnet-a population-based study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[23]  Richard D Carvajal,et al.  The promise and challenges of rare cancer research. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  L. Dawson,et al.  To RCT or Not to RCT: How to Change Practice for Rare Cancers? , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  R. Califf,et al.  Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us? , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  B. Wilkins,et al.  Pitfalls in lymphoma pathology: avoiding errors in diagnosis of lymphoid tissues , 2011, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[27]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  The National Clinical Trials Network: Conducting Successful Clinical Trials of New Therapies for Rare Cancers. , 2015, Seminars in oncology.

[29]  M Soledad Cepeda,et al.  Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey , 2015, BMJ Open.

[31]  M. Coleman,et al.  The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: an international collaboration to inform cancer policy in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. , 2013, Health policy.

[32]  G. Perilongo,et al.  Hepatoblastoma presenting with lung metastases , 2000, Cancer.

[33]  L. Billingham,et al.  Research methods to change clinical practice for patients with rare cancers. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  Catherine J. Wu,et al.  Haematological malignancies: at the forefront of immunotherapeutic innovation , 2015, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  Alan Ramsay,et al.  Importance of expert central review in the diagnosis of lymphoid malignancies in a regional cancer network. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  C. Anandan,et al.  An investigation of routes to cancer diagnosis in 10 international jurisdictions, as part of the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: survey development and implementation , 2016, BMJ Open.

[37]  Silvia Rossi,et al.  Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5--a population-based study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[38]  Jesse S Boehm,et al.  Emerging Opportunities for Target Discovery in Rare Cancers. , 2017, Cell chemical biology.

[39]  B. Fervers,et al.  Occupational exposures in rare cancers: A critical review of the literature. , 2014, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[40]  G. Gatta,et al.  Epidemiology of rare cancers and inequalities in oncologic outcomes. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[41]  D. Sargent,et al.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[42]  Robert Hauser,et al.  CancerLinQ and the future of cancer care. , 2013, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[43]  Anita Grigoriadis,et al.  Big Data: the challenge for small research groups in the era of cancer genomics , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[44]  Joshua J Gagne,et al.  Innovative research methods for studying treatments for rare diseases: methodological review , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  Carmela Dantas Barbosa Challenges with Big Data in Oncology , 2016 .

[46]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Evidence-based medicine for rare diseases: implications for data interpretation and clinical trial design. , 2007, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[47]  D. Huntsman,et al.  Rare cancers: a sea of opportunity. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[48]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Design and analysis of clinical trials for small rare disease populations , 2016 .

[49]  C. Buske,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukaemia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[50]  S. Bonvalot,et al.  Cancer registries and randomised clinical trials in rare tumours: At the two extremes of daily clinical practice. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[51]  J. Blay,et al.  Clinical trial designs for rare diseases: Studies developed and discussed by the International Rare Cancers Initiative , 2015, European journal of cancer.