Initial experience with the Pascal photocoagulator: a pilot study of 75 procedures

Background: The Pascal is a semiautomated photocoagulator that delivers a pattern array of multiple burns in a rapid predetermined sequence with a single foot pedal depression. Each burn is reduced to 10 or 20 ms to achieve this. The authors report their early experience with this system. Methods: 75 procedures done in 60 patients divided into four groups—group A, patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP); group B, patients undergoing focal or modified grid macular laser; group C, patients undergoing macular grid and group D, patients undergoing retinopexy—were retrospectively studied. Results: 31/34 procedures in group A, 24/26 procedures in group B, 5/7 procedures in group C and all eight patients in group D had successful outcomes. Significantly higher powers were required with the Pascal than with conventional laser (p<0.001) in eyes that underwent PRP and focal/modified grid macular treatment with both systems. Single session PRP was successfully performed in five patients, and five were successfully treated with a macular grid using pattern arrays only. No adverse events were noted. Conclusion: Although the shorter pulse duration of the Pascal necessitates the use of a higher power, it is not associated with adverse effects. The results here suggest that the Pascal photocoagulator is safe and effective, and offer several potential advantages related to the brief exposure time.

[1]  A Toufeeq,et al.  Pain response and follow-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) with reduced exposure times , 2009, Eye.

[2]  M. Blumenkranz,et al.  SEMIAUTOMATED PATTERNED SCANNING LASER FOR RETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION , 2006, Retina.

[3]  Ralf Brinkmann,et al.  RPE damage thresholds and mechanisms for laser exposure in the microsecond-to-millisecond time regimen. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J M Sparrow,et al.  The national diabetic retinopathy laser treatment audit III. Clinical outcomes , 1999, Eye.

[5]  J G Fujimoto,et al.  Interferometric technique for investigation of laser thermal retinal damage. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  D H Sliney,et al.  Laser photodisruptors. Damage mechanisms, instrument design and safety. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[7]  B. Doft,et al.  Single versus multiple treatment sessions of argon laser panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[8]  J Mellerio,et al.  The thermal nature of retinal laser photocoagulation. , 1966, Experimental eye research.

[9]  J M Gibson,et al.  Pain response and follow-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation with reduced exposure times , 2008, Eye.

[10]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Effect of pulse duration on size and character of the lesion in retinal photocoagulation. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  K. Shah,et al.  Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy , 2004, International ophthalmology clinics.

[12]  M. Cordeiro,et al.  Relationship of diabetic microvascular complications to outcome in panretinal photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy , 1997, Eye.

[13]  R. Birngruber,et al.  The therapeutic range of chorioretinal photocoagulation with diode and argon lasers: an experimental comparison , 1992 .

[14]  D. H. Sliney,et al.  Tissue specific damage to the retinal pigment epithelium: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications , 1992 .