Learning categories composed of varying instances: The effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment

The members of a natural category are not usually identical in their appearance, although at some level they can be described as having features in common. For example, birds have wings, but the actual appearance of their wings varies from one bird to another. To examine the effect of this feature variation on category acquisition, subjects in three experiments were asked to learn categories in which individual features were depicted with several different instances. The results of the experiments indicated that subjects had significant difficulty learning these categories when they were given a standard classification learning task. In contrast, subjects were able to acquire the same categories when they were given an inference learning task, in which they learned the categories by predicting a missing feature of a stimulus given the category label and information about the other features. Finally, subjects who were allowed to compare stimuli during learning were able to learn the categories. These results suggest that a common description of different instances emerges in the process of aligning stimuli.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[3]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[4]  D. Gentner Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[5]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[6]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[7]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[9]  D. Medin,et al.  Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  John R. Anderson The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[11]  D. Gentner,et al.  Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping , 1991 .

[12]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[13]  S. Sloman Feature-Based Induction , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[16]  William K. Estes,et al.  Classification and cognition , 1994 .

[17]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[18]  B. Ross,et al.  Predictions From Uncertain Categorizations , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  D. Medin,et al.  Similarity and Alignment in Choice , 1995 .

[20]  Mary Utter,et al.  Structural alignment in induction and similarity , 1996 .

[21]  A. Markman,et al.  Structural alignment in similarity and difference judgments , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Brian H. Ross,et al.  CATEGORY REPRESENTATIONS AND THE EFFECTS OF INTERACTING WITH INSTANCES , 1996 .

[23]  M. Lassaline,et al.  Structural alignment in induction and similarity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[25]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Constraints on Analogical Inference , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Brian H. Ross,et al.  The Use of Categories Affects Classification , 1997 .

[27]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  The creation of new concepts: A multifaceted approach to category learning. , 1997 .

[28]  D. Gentner,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article THE EFFECTS OF ALIGNABILITY ON MEMORY , 2022 .

[29]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .

[30]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Motion-Verb Generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of Language and Syntax , 1998 .

[31]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Overcoming the Early Entrant Advantage: The Role of Alignable and Nonalignable Differences , 1998 .

[32]  A. Markman,et al.  Category Learning by Inference and Classification , 1998 .

[33]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.